Showing posts with label Provision and use of Work Equipment Regulations (PUWER). Show all posts
Showing posts with label Provision and use of Work Equipment Regulations (PUWER). Show all posts

Wednesday, 16 September 2009

"Appalling State" of Welding Equipment Resulted in Explosion

A motor engineer working beneath a vehicle suffered serious burns after a cracked hose caught fire.

The accident happened on 16th July 2008 at A1 Rewinds Ltd. in Aston, Birmingham when Mr Harjit Singh Matharu, an electrical fitter at the company was trying to remove a car exhaust. He was using an oxy-acetylene welding gun, that had not been properly maintained.

The hose, which transported the acetylene to the gun, had numerous cracks and the gas leaked out into an air pocket underneath the vehicle. When the gun's flame came into contact with the leaking gas, it caught fire and subsequently exploded, which sparked a fire underneath the car.
Mr Matharu escaped from underneath the vehicle and extinguished the flames, but still received serious burns. After being rushed to hospital for treatment, Mr Singh Matharu was off work for several months following his serious injuries.

Pam Folsom, the HSE inspector investigating the incident, said that it was "immediately obvious" that the hose had not been properly maintained since its first use 28 years previous. The equipment was condemned after it had been taken away for inspection.

A1 Rewinds Ltd pleaded guilty to breaching regulation 5(1) of the Provision and use of Work Equipment Regulations (PUWER) 1998 at Birmingham Magistrates' Court on 24th April 2009. They were fined £2,000 and ordered to pay £1,500 towards the HSE's costs.

The company who have no previous convictions for safety offences expressed its remorse for the incident.

Inspector Folsom said: "The hoses were in an absolutely appalling state, totally perished, and had been shortened each time that a bend split the hose, allowing highly flammable gas to escape. The consequences of a gas cloud igniting beneath a vehicle, while a man is in the middle of that explosive mixture, are likely to be horrific.

"It is important for companies to ensure that they have fully considered all the risks their employees may face when using any equipment. The hoses were so obviously badly perished that there is no excuse for this incident."

Firm Fined for Worker Pinned Inside Unguarded Conveyor

A lead manufacturing company has been fined after a factory worker received broken ribs after becoming trapped on a moving conveyor, while trying to remove a blockage.

Stephen Shore, an employee of Calder Industrial Materials, was trying to remove a blockage of metal swarf from a conveyor, which was positioned underneath an automatic saw. Mr Shore was cutting rolls of lead into various sizes with the saw when the incident occurred on 20th February 2008 at the company premises.

A tipping table is used to cut the lead and the excess metal falls onto a conveyor belt and taken to a collection area. Mr Shore crawled underneath the machine to remove the fragments which had built up on the conveyor causing a blockage.

However, Mr Shore had not isolated the machine and he was pinned against a metal bar after the tipping table came down on him as he was leaning over the conveyor.

A colleague switched off the machine after noticing Mr Shore was in trouble however he was unable to free him. He was freed by fire fighters who attended the scene. Mr Shore sustained two cracked ribs and a bruised heart and returned to work 4 days later.

On 30th July 2009 at Chester Magistrates' Court, Calder Industrial Materials pleaded guilty to breaching regulation 11(1) of PUWER 1998 for failing to prevent access to the dangerous part of the machine. The company was fined £4,500 and ordered to pay costs of £1,050.

The firm has since installed an interlock gate and guarding to prevent employees from accessing the conveyor.

Bruce Jones, HSE inspector said: "Mr Shore was badly injured because Calder Industrial Materials failed to prevent him from gaining access to dangerous machinery.

"Fixed guards and a padlocked gate should have prevented Mr Shore from entering the machine and accessing the underside of a tipping table, which is used to tip debris on to a conveyor belt. But the guards and gate were not installed until after the incident."