Health
and Safety in the news this week
Schools asbestos 'scandal' still
threatening lives – report
Decades of lax attitudes towards tackling
deadly asbestos in schools is a national "scandal" threatening the
health of former, current and future schoolchildren, a wide-ranging
investigation has found.
The Joint Union Asbestos Committee (JUAC)
said examples of the problem in schools underlined "systematic
failings" in the way it was dealt with by successive governments. The JUAC said Whitehall had a "scandalous
disregard for life" by permitting inadequate surveys and campaigning
against compulsory detection that it said would help prevent future cases of
asbestos cancer mesothelioma.
The report said successive governments
failed to require schools to keep asbestos records and inform parents about the
material in their child's school. It
said:
"This has enabled the culprits to
evade responsibility for asbestos exposure leading to mesothelioma, allowing
them to escape with impunity. Nothing
can be done to put right past asbestos exposure, but we must do more to protect
future generations of school children and staff."
Asbestos can be found in wall panels,
ceiling tiles, floors, fire breaks, columns, door frames, and ceiling and wall
voids but it can also creep into classrooms and corridors if it is disturbed,
such as through having children crashing into affected areas. The UK currently has the highest incidence of
mesothelioma in the world and it is steadily increasing. According to the Health and Safety Executive,
more people in the UK die from the disease than in road accidents.
The report identified one asbestos victim,
Sarah Bowman, who developed the disease in her 40s, more than three decades
after leaving Braincroft Primary and William Gladstone schools in the Brent
area of London. She was said to have
been too ill to attend the National Union of Teachers (NUT) conference in
Brighton this weekend where the report was presented.
The report found the risk to children -
including Ms Bowman's son, who attended one of the schools several years later
- was underestimated because risk assessments and tests were designed for
adults working with asbestos, and not for long-term exposure of children who
are known to be more vulnerable.
JUAC said government documents released
under Freedom of Information rules suggested full and comprehensive new laws to
reduce the risk of exposure to asbestos were dismissed by politicians on cost
grounds.
Mary Bousted, general secretary of the
Association of Teachers and Lecturers (ATL), described the report as
"shocking".
She said: "It is outrageous that staff
and pupils are still dying from being exposed to asbestos in schools. ATL has been campaigning about this for
years. Action must be taken by the Government now."
Unite general secretary Len McCluskey said:
"Only through the safe, planned removal of all the asbestos which still
remains in place across the UK, will the deadly menace of asbestos be lifted
from future generations."
Asbestos campaigner Hank Roberts,
presenting the report at the NUT conference, said: "It is disgraceful.
This document shows absolutely everything you can think of has been going wrong
- negligence, deceit, lying. Saying it
is safe is an absolute lie."
A Department for Education spokesman said:
"Nothing is more important than the health and safety of children and
staff in our schools. Since 2010, billions
has been invested to improve the condition of the school estate, with a further
£23 billion on school buildings to come over this Parliament. This will help ensure asbestos is managed
safely and that the amount in school buildings continues to reduce over time. We have also published new guidance on
managing asbestos in schools, and have transformed the way in which we collect
information on asbestos to better our understanding."
Source: www.dailymail.co.uk
Automotive company fined after
worker loses finger
A Birmingham-based automotive company has been fined after a
worker lost his finger.
Birmingham Magistrates’ Court heard how a welder at Lander
Automotives Limited was expected to work on a variety of jobs as required by
production. While he was working on a
machine the employee’s glove became entangled in the drill bit. He suffered partial amputation to the third
finger on his right hand.
An investigation by the Health and Safety Executive (HSE) into
the incident which occurred on 17 June 2015 found that the company failed to
provide adequate training, a safe system of work, a risk assessment or method
statement.
Lander Automotive Limited, of Clapgate Lane, Birmingham, pleaded
guilty to breaching Section 3(1) of the Health and Safety at Work etc. Act
1974, and was fined £27,000 and ordered to pay costs of £1,574 and a £120
victim surcharge.
Solar panel specialists in
court for roof light fall failings
A solar panel firm has been £153,000 after a worker was seriously injured in a fall through a fragile roof light at a private home in Kent.
The worker, from Ashford, fractured his shin and a vertebra in
the incident at Elvington Lane in Hawkinge on 30 April 2013.
The roof light the 32-year-old man crashed through was on an
outbuilding housing a swimming pool. Although the water partially cushioned his
fall, he made a heavy impact with the side and flooring around the pool, and
was unable to return to work until January this year and only then on a
part-time basis.
Glasgow-based P V Solar UK Limited was sentenced at Canterbury
Crown Court after an investigation by the Health and Safety Executive (HSE)
found that more could and should have been done to prevent the fall.
The court had heard in a hearing in January 2016, when the
company pleaded guilty to three health and safety offences, that the injured
worker was part of a three man team working on the pool building to replace
faulty solar panels that were initially installed by the same company in April
2011.
The fragile roof also contained eight roof lights and he fell
through one of these as he walked on the roof while carrying a panel.
HSE established that a scaffold tower, ladder and safety harness
had been provided for the panel replacement work. However, none of the installation team had
received any formal training or instruction on how to use them. This effectively rendered the equipment
useless. Other measures could also have
been taken, such as providing full scaffolding or hard covers for the
rooflights.
HSE established that although the initial installation work in
2011 was completed without incident, the safety equipment provided on that
occasion was also lacking, which again placed workers at risk.
The court had also been told that P V Solar was served with a
Prohibition Notice by HSE to stop unsafe work on a fragile roof in Bristol in
May 2011. The company was therefore well
aware of the need to ensure that adequate provisions were in place to prevent
or mitigate falls during work at height.
P V Solar UK Limited, of Cambuslang Road, Glasgow, was fined a
total of £153,000 and ordered to pay a further £29,480 in costs after pleading
guilty to three separate breaches of the Work at Height Regulations 2005.
After the hearing, HSE Inspector Melvyn Stancliffe said:
“The injured worker suffered serious injury in the fall and
could have been killed. He and his
colleagues were effectively left to their own devices with equipment that was
not wholly suited for the task at hand. In
short, better equipment, training and supervision should have been provided. Working on or near a fragile roof or
materials is not a task to be undertaken without proper planning, and without
having the appropriate safety measures in place at all times. There is considerable free guidance available
from the HSE regarding the precautions needed when working at height, including
on or near fragile roof coverings.”
HSE Health and Safety Myths
Buster
Gym manager queried customer’s complaint on gym users topping up personal water bottles from cooler
Issue
A customer made a complaint about other gym users filling up personal water bottles from a water cooler instead of using the disposable cone cups provided. The customer stated that this was against health and safety regulations as germs could be spread this way.
Panel opinion
It is important for gym
users to keep hydrated and there are no health and safety reasons why they
cannot do so using their own bottles rather than the paper cups provided. Other
establishments which do ban gym users from using their own bottles are likely
to have other motives for doing so – but it is not a health and safety issue.
Source: www.hse.gov.uk
No comments:
Post a Comment