Tuesday, 16 August 2016


Health and Safety in the news this week

Newport residents voice health concerns over dust from development

Residents in Newport have raised health and safety concerns over the content of dust coming from a construction site.

The brownfield site, formerly Whiteheads Steelworks, runs alongside the heavily-populated Mendalgief Road as well as two schools and a retirement home.  Around 500 homes are set to be built by Walters Group in a £75 million Welsh Government-backed development from Tirion Homes.

Construction work has left several cars along the road covered with powder and resident Christopher Doig, who collected samples of the dust from his windowsill, found that the substance stuck to a magnet.  The former engineer, 72, once had pneumonia and is worried that the dirt thrown up into the air could set off another attack.

“I was out in the garden the other day trying to enjoy a cup of tea and our table was covered in the stuff,” said Mr Doig. "We’ve been having this since December and I’ve had enough.  The concrete is being smashed up into a fine powder and it’s getting everywhere.  We're all breathing this stuff in and we've got no idea what's in it."

Other residents along Mendalgief Road have also noticed ‘high’ levels of dust on their cars and windows.

Bill Barnett, 70, said he and his wife Irene, 66, have been 'plagued' by the dust which is getting into their home.  He said they have both been to the GP three times with chest problems which they suspect is due to the levels of dust.  Mr Barnett said: "The dust is constant - it's black and brown.  You can feel it like sand in your mouth.  We can't open any of the windows because of it even though it's stifling."

The couple said they have been spending around £10 a week to clean both of their cars due to the constant dust.

Councillor Ibrahim Hayat said himself and other Newport City Council members shared the concerns of his constituents.

Cllr Hayat said: “Within minutes of being in the area I can feel it against my chest and in my eyes, so I can’t imagine what it's like for those who live here.  We just don’t know what is in this stuff – for all we know it could lead to health problems a few years down the line."

Councillor Hayat added that a project manager from Walters is reportedly organising an 'urgent public meeting' for an unspecified date.

Environmental health officers from Newport council visited the site following concerns raised by residents and said they have advised contractor on how to keep dust levels down.

A council spokesman said: "Newport City Council is satisfied that the contractors are following the correct working practices.  We will continue to work with them to ensure dust emissions are minimised and managed appropriately."

A spokesman for Tirion Group said the council's environmental health officers have been 'satisfied that the site complies with all necessary environmental standards on every visit.'

He said: "At Whiteheads we are working closely with remediation contractors Walters UK to ensure minimal disturbance is caused to local residents while the site is prepared for construction, and that the highest safety standards are adhered to.  Walters has worked with Celtic Technologies throughout the remediation process to ensure that the levels of on-site soil and dust are monitored constantly, and to ensure that they pose no danger to local residents or the general public."

He added Tirion has conducted a timetable of regular consultation meetings with local residents and will continue to do so in the future.

Source: South Wales Argus

 
HSE prosecution round up:

School fined after worker fell from height

A school in Brentwood has pleaded guilty to breaching health and safety regulations after a worker was injured as he fell from a roof.

Chelmsford Crown Court heard how in January 2014 a maintenance team at the school was working to replace components on a bay window of a residential flat within the school grounds.  A 63-year-old employee was working on the roof of the bay window when his foot got caught and he fell approximately 2.6 metres to the ground below.  He was taken to hospital and was found to have suffered injuries including a broken collarbone and chipped vertebrae.

An investigation by Health and Safety Executive (HSE) into the incident found that there were no effective guardrails or any other means of protection to prevent workers from falling from the roof.  There were no supervisory arrangements and the work was not carried out in a safe manner.

Brentwood School Charitable Incorporated Organisation, Brentwood, Essex, pleaded guilty to breaching Regulation 4(1) of the Work at Height Regulations 2005, and was fined £40,000 and ordered to pay £1,477 in costs.

Security firms fined over death of security guard

Two security companies have been fined after a security guard died from carbon monoxide poisoning.

Javaid Iqbal, a 29 year old father of three, was employed by London based KK Security Services Ltd as a security guard on a construction site in Leigh, Wigan.  KK Security were sub-contracted by Veritas Security (Southern) Ltd, a Southampton based company, despite it being written into the contract from the client that no sub-contracting would take place.

Liverpool Magistrates’ Court heard that during the early hours of 6th December 2014, the site’s generator failed in sub-zero temperatures and, in an attempt to keep warm, Mr Iqbal lit some barbecue coals in a wheelbarrow which he placed in a 20 foot steel container used as the site office.  Mr Iqbal was found dead by police a few hours later having died from carbon monoxide poisoning.

The court also heard that Mr Iqbal had made a number of attempts to re-start the site generator and had sought assistance from both his employers but neither had provided any meaningful assistance to him.

A Health and Safety Executive (HSE) investigation found that KK Securities Limited failed to provide a management system to protect the welfare and safety of their employees, particularly lone workers.  No real provision had been made by the company for emergency support, the only option open to Mr Iqbal being to ring his employer who was hundreds of miles away and could offer no practical assistance.

The investigation also found Veritas Security (Southern) Limited failed to put proper arrangements in place with the site occupier for emergency situations outside office hours, such as a loss of power or heating.

HSE Principal Inspector Neil Jamieson said after the hearing:

“Mr Iqbal should have been required to ring and speak to his company every hour or have some form of panic button. His calls were not being monitored.  Instead of this he was simply required to text in every hour stating that all was well.

“This tragic death could have been so easily avoided had either KK Securities Limited or Veritas Security (Southern) Limited made adequate arrangement to regularly check on Mr Iqbal’s welfare during the quiet hours.  Instead, it appears he was left to fend for himself”.

KK Security Services Ltd, of One Canada Square, Canary Wharf, London, pleaded guilty to breaching section 2(1) of the Health and Safety at Work etc. Act 1974 and was fined £8,000 with £ 4,854 costs.

Veritas Security (Southern) Ltd, of St Anne Street, Salisbury, Wiltshire, pleaded guilty to breaching section 3(1) of the Health and Safety at Work etc. Act 1974 and was fined £8,000 with £6,220 costs.

Both parties were also required to pay an additional £120 victims surcharge.

Diecasting firm fined after worker suffers serious burns

Manchester aluminium diecasting producer Presbar Diecastings Ltd, has been fined £140,000 after a worker suffered life threatening injuries when he became trapped in a machine.

Manchester Crown Court heard that on 7 July 2015 the worker had entered the middle of the aluminium diecasting machine between the furnace pot and the front bar to clear a build-up of metal.  Whilst carrying out this routine procedure the robot arm started to move, the worker tried to move out of the way but was trapped by the ladle containing 400 degrees centigrade molten metal attached to the robot arm.  He suffered a cardiac arrest and fourth degree burns.

A Health and Safety Executive (HSE) investigation found the machine had only been partially guarded making access to the ladle possible. This was despite there being a risk assessment in place at the time of the incident identifying the hazard of contact or entrapment with the ladle.

Presbar Diecasting Ltd of Store Street, Manchester pleaded guilty to breaching Regulation 11(1) of the Provision and Use of Work Equipment Regulations 1998.

The company was fined £140,000 and ordered to pay £9,788.56 costs and £120 victim surcharge.

Speaking after the hearing HSE Principal Inspector Mike Sebastian said:

“A man suffered life changing injuries which could have been prevented if the machine had been properly guarded.  Employers should ensure that they regularly check, assess and review the guarding on their machinery to ensure that all access to dangerous parts in prevented.”

Worker suffers serious burns after clothing catches fire

A foundry based in Batley has been fined after a worker suffered serious burns when his clothing caught fire.

Bradford Crown Court heard how an employee of Batley Foundry Limited was undertaking work involving the use of isopropanol and a paint-like solution. The bucket containing the solution caught fire which then set light to his clothes, causing serious burns.

An investigation by the Health and Safety Executive (HSE) into the incident which occurred on 5 August 2014 found that the company failed to provide adequate training, work equipment and personal protective equipment (PPE).

Batley Foundry Limited, of Warwick Road, Batley, pleaded guilty to breaching Section 2(1) of the Health and Safety at Work etc. Act 1974, and was fined £15,000 and ordered to pay costs of £9000.

Speaking after the hearing, HSE Inspector John Boyle said:

“A worker was left with serious injuries as a result of this incident.  Had the company taken a number of simple measures prior to the work activity taking place – such as the provision of suitable work equipment, training and personal protective equipment – then it may well have been avoided.”


 

 

No comments:

Post a Comment