Monday 29 February 2016


Consultants Out and About
 
Jack saw some "proper lifting" being carried out in London last week!
 
Health and Safety in the news this week

A British fire chief says it's "highly unlikely" that three people still missing after part of a mothballed British power plant collapsed are alive.
Dave Etheridge, chief fire officer at Oxfordshire Fire and Rescue Service, said last Wednesday that rescue workers "have not picked up any signs of life" in the 30-foot (9-meter) high mound of rubble.

One person was confirmed dead and five others were hospitalized after the industrial accident on Tuesday 23rd February at Didcot power station, 60 miles (100 kilometers) west of London. The facility is an old coal- and oil-fueled plant that has been closed since 2013 and is slated for demolition. The complex also houses a separate operating gas-powered plant.
Owner Npower said part of the old power station collapsed while a demolition contractor was working on it, sending a huge cloud of dust into the air.

Some 50 people were treated for dust inhalation at the scene. The fire service said no hazardous materials were found in the building.
Source: Daily Mail online

New CDM overhaul on the cards
The overhauled Construction (Design and Management) Regulations (CDM) could face further change as part of a government initiative to cut red tape in the housebuilding sector.

The Department for Business, Innovation and Skills (BIS) and the Cabinet Office announced on 2 December that they will be reviewing all aspects of regulation in the industry.  However, they singled out the new version of CDM, saying the government is keen to look at how the sector is adapting to the changes.  They also wanted to hear if “any legislation derived from EU obligations is being implemented more strictly than required” and would consider wider health and safety regulation.
The consultation, which closed on 13th January, invited all involved in building homes to submit evidence of legislation or enforcement that could be made “simpler, more cost effective, efficient, proportionate or consistent”.

CDM 2015 came into force in April and was the third iteration of the regulations originally enacted in 1994.  The amendments removed the CDM co-ordinator and created the principal designer role to oversee the pre-construction phase of projects involving two or more contractors.
A decision has not been made about whether the regulations will be supported by an approved code of practice.  The Construction Industry Advisory Committee, made up of HSE, union and business representatives, failed to reach an agreement when it met in November. 

The Conservative government entered office in May promising to substantially cut red tape.  The review forms part of the Cutting Red Tape review programme, which runs rolling reviews of regulation in different sectors.  “This review will give housebuilders and smaller construction businesses a powerful voice as part of our £10 billion deregulation drive”, said business secretary Sajid Javid.  “Where rules are too complicated, ineffective or poorly enforced, I want to hear about it and the government will take action.”
When CDM 2015 came into force, some commentators predicted it would not be the final set of regulations since a planned EU review of the law that underpins it, the Temporary or Mobile Construction Sites Direction, might require more revisions.


HSE consults on new strategy
·         Helping Great Britain Work Well will focus on six key themes
·         Better risk management “can help economy”

The HSE has launched a consultation on its new five-year strategy saying that Britain’s economy could grow if risks are better managed and health and safety performance improved.
The strategy, called Helping Great Britain Work Well, will be based around six themes.  The regulator is urging everyone involved in health and safety to have their say on what the strategy should achieve.

The themes are:
·         Promoting broader ownership of workplace health and safety
·         Highlighting and tackling the burden of work-related ill health
·         Supporting small firms
·         Simplifying risk management and helping business to grow
·         Anticipating and tackling the challenges of new technology and ways of working
·         Promoting the benefits of Britain’s world-class health and safety system.

HSE chair Judith Hackitt said: “We can be proud of the country’s record on work-related safety and health – it’s one of the best in the world.  Making it even better is the challenge, so that we can all continue to help Great Britain work well.  Getting risk management right is an enabler for productivity, innovation and growth, and is integral to business success as well as the wellbeing of workers.
More information is available on: www.hse.gov.uk/strategy

Source: www.iirsm.org

HSE prosecution round up:

Scaffolding firm in court after worker’s roof fall

Hemel Hempstead Scaffolding Limited has been fined after a worker suffered life changing injuries when he fell from the roof of a barn.
Stewart Thomas from Hemel Hempstead, 31 at the time of the incident, was carrying out scaffolding work in preparation for the installation of solar panels on a barn roof at Gaddesden Home Farm, Bridens Camp on Red Lion Lane on 25 July 2013.

St Albans Crown Court heard that father of one Mr Thomas was placing scaffold boards along the roof ridge when he fell through the fragile roof to the concrete floor eight metres below. He suffered multiple injuries to his head and neck including a brain stem injury, a punctured lung, broken ribs and a lacerated liver. Mr Thomas is now unable to talk, move or feed himself and requires residential care.
A Health and Safety Executive (HSE) investigation found Hemel Hempstead Scaffolding Limited had never provided a written method statement or risk assessment for this work. Critically there were no fall protection measures in place, and there was also no appropriate supervision of inexperienced and trainee scaffolders on the site.

Hemel Hempstead Scaffolding Limited of Seymour Crescent, Hemel Hempstead pleaded guilty to breaching section 2 (1) of the Health and Safety at Work etc Act, 1974 and were fined £110,000 and ordered to pay £22,596 in costs.
Speaking after the hearing HSE Inspector Stephen Manley said: “The Company’s approach to health and safety was poor. They failed to properly and safely plan the work they were contracted to carry out and failed to supervise inexperienced young workers. The particular works would have been unfamiliar to the team and so the lack of thorough supervision was lamentable.

As a result of their failings a young father has been left being unable to communicate or look after himself and he will never be able to play with his young daughter”.
When working at height, there is a high likelihood of serious injury or death if safe procedures are not put in place and adequate steps taken to ensure they are followed”.

Company fined for failure to comply with improvement notices
A London based company who fabricate structural steel products has been fined for failure to maintain compliance with the law following prior HSE enforcement action.

Westminster Magistrates’ Court heard how William Fry Fabrications Limited failed to thoroughly examine two cranes used by the company, despite receiving both Improvement and Prohibition Notices on this issue for its cranes in 2011.
An investigation by the Health and Safety Executive (HSE) found that between 2012 and 2015 the cranes had not been thoroughly examined at least every 12 months despite an absolute legal duty to do so.

William Fry Fabrications Limited, of Neasden Lane, London, pleaded guilty to breaching Regulation 9(3)(a) of the Lifting Operations and Lifting Equipment Regulations 1998, and was fined £13,333 and ordered to pay full costs of £2,527.
Source: www.hse.gov.uk

HSE Health and Safety Myths Buster
Issue

A member of staff has been told that all visitors to the building where she works have to be shown the comprehensive asbestos register, even if they are only coming for a meeting and not doing any physical work.  For example a visitor attending a verbal meeting with the store manager has to sign to say they have seen it. The building is a retail outlet with back offices and does have managed asbestos in some areas but not all.  The enquirer would understand if the visitor was a contractor doing works to the building fabric, but felt this was over-the-top and wonder if the myth busters could confirm.
Panel decision

The serious health risks from exposure to asbestos are well known.  The Control of Asbestos Regulations (CAR) 2012 contain a duty to pass on information about asbestos to people liable to disturb it in the course of their work or visit. However, there is no reason why people visiting simply to attend a meeting would need to see this information.  New guidance published by the Retail Asbestos Working Group (RAWG), and supported by HSE, provides sensible, practical, advice on managing asbestos and working with asbestos containing materials in trading stores and shops. The guidance confirms that the measures described by the enquirer go beyond what is needed to manage the risk of exposure for visitors.

 

No comments:

Post a Comment