HSE prosecution round up:
Company fined after worker falls from van roof
A glazing firm was fined after
a worker fell from the roof of a van, causing severe head injuries.
On 19 June 2012, Alan Campbell,
who worked for Anglian Windows Limited, fell when loading an easi-dec system
onto the roof of the van after working at a domestic property.
Mr Campbell, 47, suffered two
bleeds to the brain and was kept in an induced coma for over three weeks.
Compression to his forehead required a metal plate to be inserted to partly
reshape his face. He now suffers epilepsy and is unable to drive.
After an investigation by the HSE,
the Crown Office and the Procurator Fiscal Service, it was found that Anglian
Windows Limited had failed to provide sufficient information, instruction,
training and supervision to employees who were required to load and unload
equipment from van roofs.
Anglian Windows Limited, of
Anson Road, Norwich, pleaded guilty at Livingston Sheriff Court, and was fined
£10,000 for breaching Section 2(1) of the Health and Safety at Work etc. Act
1974.
Company director fined after worker falls through skylight
The company director of a sash
restoration company has been fined for safety failings after a worker fell
three metres through an unprotected skylight.
Salisbury Magistrates’ Court
heard how on the 14 July 2014, an employee of the Sash Restoration Company (Dorset)
Limited fell through an unprotected skylight breaking his wrist when landing.
The HSE found that the work was
not adequately planned to take account of the risk of working near to a fragile
surface. The incident was not reported by the company and only came to HSE’s
attention following a query about the incident from an unnamed source.
David Richard Garrett, Director
of Sash Restoration Company Dorset Limited, of Henford Road, Ensbury Park,
Bournemouth, was fined a total of £3,300, with costs of £1,526, after pleading
guilty to an offence under Regulation 9(2) of the Work at Height Regulations
2005, and Regulation 4(1) of RIDDOR (Reporting of Injuries, Disease and
Dangerous Occurrences Regulations) 2013.
Three companies fined after construction worker seriously
injured in fall from height
Three companies have been fined
a total of £90,000 after a worker was seriously injured when he fell nearly six
metres from a platform with unguarded rails.
Southwark Crown Court heard
that on 4 March 2013 two workers accessed the top level of a unit which was to
be dismantled as part of construction work at a site in Westferry Road, London.
One of the workers slipped and
fell over the side of the platform, hitting the wall and then landing on the
concrete floor 5.9 metres below. He sustained multiple injuries including
internal bleeding, a collapsed lung, and fractures to his pelvis and right arm
and has been left unable to work.
Meta Management Services
Limited (trading as Aktrion), of Rutland Court, Edinburgh, who was the Principal
Contractor for the project, pleaded guilty to a breach of Regulation 22(1)(c)
of the Construction, Design and Management Regulations 2007 and was fined
£9,000 with £1,942 in costs.
Goss Graphic Systems Limited of
Beech House, The Oaks Business Park, Longridge Road, Preston, pleaded guilty to
a breach of Regulation 13(2) of the Construction, Design and Management
Regulations 2007, and Regulation 4 of the Working at Height Regulation 2005 and
was fined a total of £27,000 with costs of £7,000.
Beck and Pollitzer Engineering
Limited of Burnham Road, Dartford, Kent pleaded guilty to a breach of
Regulation 4 of the Working at Height Regulation 2005 and was fined £54,000
with costs of £14,000.
Firm fined after worker suffered cement burns
A building products
manufacturer was fined after a worker suffered serious cement burns on his
first day of work.
Leicester Magistrates’ Court
heard how a 21-year-old inexperienced agency worker was exposed to alkaline
cement slurry by standing in a drainage pit with inadequate Personal Protective
Equipment.
The worker suffered chemical
burns to his feet and ankles. He required plastic surgery and his feet and
lower legs are scarred for life. He was in hospital for three weeks.
An investigation by the HSE
into the incident which occurred on 28th April 2014 at Station Road, Stoney
Stanton, found that the company had not appreciated that slurry from cured
concrete dust posed the same risks as that from cement or wet uncured concrete.
They had no risk assessment for
the slurry or suitable and sufficient controls to eliminate, reduce or control
the risks. A mechanical system to remove slurry from the water pit would have
prevented these life changing injuries.
Stressline Limited pleaded
guilty to breaching Section 3(1) of the Health and Safety at Work etc Act 1974
and was fined £12,000 and ordered to pay costs of £2,121.
NHS prosecuted after pensioner killed in mobility scooter plunge
The NHS Litigation Authority
has been prosecuted after an 82 year old man fell 12 feet to his death from an
elevated walkway outside a health centre.
Benjamin John Withers from
Fareham in Hampshire died after the mobility scooter he was driving collided
with a wooden weather screen which was situated around the main entrance and
access bridge to Fareham Health centre. The collision caused a section to give
way and Mr Withers and his mobility scooter fell through the gap onto a walkway
below.
Portsmouth Crown Court heard
that on 20th September 2012 Mr Withers left the centre after
attending an appointment and accidentally drove his mobility scooter forward
into the side of the glazed screen instead of reversing away from it.
After the initial impact he then moved forward again and fell through the
opening in the screen which had partially given way.
A HSE investigation found the
barrier had not been constructed to the required standard to resist impact from
a mobility scooter, no assessment had been made to consider the suitability of
the weather screen and the structure had not been adequately maintained.
The investigation also found
that the collapsed section was so badly decayed that portions of the wood could
be easily removed by hand. Planned maintenance work to replace the rotten wood
had been cancelled and rescheduled on more than twenty occasions without ever
being carried out.
NHS Litigation Authority of
Buckingham Palace Road London, pleaded guilty to breaching s.3(1) of the Health
and Safety at Work etc Act 1974 and was fined £40,000 and ordered to pay
£15,000 costs.
Firm sentenced after worker loses hand in Machine
A waste plastic recycling firm
has been fined after an employee’s hand was severed when dragged into a
granulator machine.
CP Plastics Limited was
prosecuted by the HSE following an incident at Manchester New Road, Middleton,
Manchester on the 4 March 2015.
Manchester Magistrates’ Court
heard the employee, who has been deaf since birth, has been severely affected
by the injury. The loss of his right hand in the incident means that he is
unable to drive or work and is finding it difficult to use sign language to
communicate.
The 50-year-old employee had
been feeding a granulator machine with waste plastic. During the process the
machine slowed down so he went to look through an inspection hatch to find the
cause. He was reaching inside the machine in order to pull through the plastic
which was slowing the machine, when the plastic wrapped around his right hand
and dragged it into the granulator blades.
The HSE investigation found
there was no safe system of work in place. The inspection hatch should not have
been on the machine and employees should not have had access to the dangerous
cutting blade.
The investigation also found
that the company had failed to provide Employer’s Liability Compulsory
Insurance (ELCI) at the time of the incident.
CP Plastics Ltd pleaded guilty
to two offences, one breach of Regulation 11 of the Provision and Use of Work
Equipment Regulations 1998, and one breach under Section 1 of the Employers
Liability (Compulsory Insurance) Act 1969.
In an unusual ruling the
company was fined £1,500, but the judge also ordered CP Plastics to pay £17,000
in compensation to the injured employee, and ordered to pay £1,500 towards
prosecution costs.
HSE Myth Busters:
Refuse
Collectors Christmas hats banned
Issue
Refuse workers in Colchester were banned from wearing Christmas
hats and any other Christmas-related clothing on the grounds of health and
safety.Panel opinion
There is no health and safety legislation that prevents refuse collectors wearing Santa hats or entering the festive spirit with other modest decorations. Excessive displays which might impede the driver's vision or cause a distraction are another matter, but that doesn't seem to be the case here. Being sensible about health and safety can still allow everyone to have some fun too!
Gym manager queried customer’s
complaint on gym users topping up personal water bottles from cooler
Issue
A customer made a complaint
about other gym users filling up personal water bottles from a water cooler
instead of using the disposable cone cups provided. The customer stated that
this was against health and safety regulations as germs could be spread this
way.
Panel opinion
Well done to the gym manager
for raising this and bringing it to our attention. It is important for gym
users to keep hydrated and there are no health and safety reasons why they
cannot do so using their own bottles rather than the paper cups provided. Other
establishments which do ban gym users from using their own bottles are likely
to have other motives for doing so – but it is not a health and safety issue.
Source: www.hse.gov.uk
No comments:
Post a Comment