Wednesday, 16 December 2015


Everyone at RHSS Ltd would like to wish you all a very Merry Christmas and a Happy (and safe) New Year!

Rob, Jack, Martin, David, Michael and Sarah


Blog will return in 2016.


HSE prosecution round up:

Worker killed by falling from ladder during boiler inspection
A sub-contractor was fined after a worker was killed when he fell from a ladder during an inspection of a boiler.
Winchester Magistrates’ Court heard how third party contractor, David Wood, (62 at the time of the accident), of Hampshire was inspecting a boiler in the loft space of a private residence. The ladder had been incorrectly fitted which resulted in Mr Woods falling and suffering fatal injuries.
An investigation by the HSE into the incident, which occurred on 19th March 2013, found that the sub-contractor Poitr Kowalczyk, who could not speak or read English and was not conversant with current British health and safety standards, was tasked with carrying out refurbishment and improvement works at the residence. This included fitting a propriety loft ladder. The ceiling, not being of a standard height was not compatible with either two or three section extendable ladders.
Piotr Kowalczyk chose to fit the longer three section ladder. However, due to the restricted loft space it was not possible to fit the retaining bar on the ladder. The retaining bar is a safety device that locks the ladder at a safe angle.
When Mr Wood was on the ladder, the omission of the retaining bar allowed the ladder to slide forward causing Mr Wood to fall backward to the floor below. This resulted in fatal head injuries.
Piotr Kowalczyk, of Howard Road, Southampton, was sentenced to six months imprisonment, suspended for two years and ordered to pay costs of £12,404 after pleading guilty to offences under Section 3(2) of the Health and Safety at Work etc Act 1974. 

Worker injured after falling through rooflight
A painting company has been fined after a worker fell through a roof light whilst working at height.
Cwmbran Magistrates’ Court heard the employee working for Williams Contractors Limited of Pontypridd, was carrying out painting work when he fell off a Youngman board and through the roof lights.
He suffered a broken left wrist and injuries to his chest, back hip and leg and was unable to work for six months.
An investigation by the HSE into the incident, which occurred in August 2013, at A Schulman Incorporated Limited, Crumlin, Newport, found that there was poor planning and supervision of the task and an unsafe method of work.
Williams Contractors Limited, of Gelliwastad Road, Pontypridd, was fined a total of £12,000 and ordered to pay costs of £1,069 after pleading guilty to an offence under Regulation 4(1) of the Work at Height Regulations 2005. 

Tradesman fined after employee lost fingers
Richard John Pullinger, a sole trader that recycles cardboard in Polesworth, was fined after a 19-year-old employee suffered severe damage to his left hand when it was drawn into a roller press that had no guards on it.
Nuneaton Magistrates Court heard that the employee, Wade Moore, who had only been working for Mr Pullinger for three weeks, had his hand on top of cardboard as it was being drawn into the rollers. There was no emergency stop button on the machine but another operator realised what had happened and put the machine quickly into reverse mode.
Wade lost a third of his fifth finger, part of his ring finger and thumb, had multiple fractures and lacerations of his hand and needed a five hour operation to limit the damage. He still requires physiotherapy treatment and has had a further operation on his thumb.
An investigation by the HSE found that the machine was at least 26-years-old and was in a poor state of repair. A prohibition notice was immediately issued after the incident and a guard was fitted to the machine days later.
Richard John Pullinger trading at Unit 5A Pooley Hall Farm Pooley Lane, Polesworth, was fined £13,000 and was ordered to pay £6,143 in costs after he pleaded guilty to a Contravention of Regulation 11(1) of the Provision and Use of Work Equipment Regulations 1998 as effective measures had not been taken to prevent access to the dangerous parts of the roller press. 

Company fined after scaffolding blown over during dismantling
A scaffolding company was fined after scaffolding hit a bus and pedestrians when it blew over during dismantling.
Leicester Magistrates’ Court heard how on 28 January 2015, Emperor Scaffolding Limited of Leicester was dismantling scaffolding on Charles Street when the incident occurred. The scaffolding hit a bus, landed on a parked van and hit two members of the public.
An investigation by the HSE into the incident found that the company was not following a safe system of work. The scaffolding was not tied to the building and sheeting was left in place. The scaffolding dismantling took place over four days and the workers failed to check the scaffolding condition before they started or to take adequate measures to correct defects and ensure it would not collapse during the dismantling.
Emperor Scaffolding Limited, of Fairefield Crescent, Glenfield, Leicester, was fined a total of £8,000, with costs of £2,000 after pleading guilty to offences under Regulation 28(1) of the Construction (Design and Management) Regulations. 

Construction firm fined over unsafe work practises during refurbishment
J B Barbour and Co Ltd has been fined after a worker was killed when he was struck by a falling signage and fascia assembly during shop fitting work at a retail unit.
On the 6 July 2011, the 26-year-old employee, Michael Kelly, was clearing debris from the dismantling of shop front units, when the fastenings to the signage and fascia suspended above Mr Kelly failed causing one end to drop down to the shop floor level striking Mr Kelly and causing fatal injuries.
The HSE investigation found that the company failed to properly assess the supporting arrangements for the signage and fascia assuming they were supported by steel hangers and that it would be safe to remove the shop fronts.
Stafford Crown Court heard that the incident could have been prevented if work had been properly planned, assessed and supervised. The company’s own method statement had sufficient information to implement some control measures that could have prevented the incident, but neither the site team nor management team recognised the need to follow their own guidance after receiving a holding request had been made by their client that affected the sequence of work.
J B Barbour and Co Limited of Lawmoor Street, Dixons Blazes Industrial Estate, Glasgow pleaded guilty to breaching Section 2 (1) and Section 3 (1) of the Health and Safety at Work Act 1974 and was fined £85,000 with £89,053 costs. 

Three companies fined after worker lost his life
Three companies have been fined for safety failings after a concrete panel fell from a lorry and killed a worker.
Derby Crown Court heard how on 11 January 2011 Mr Travis Hale, 45, was employed as a driver by Punchards Haulage Limited (Punchards) to transport a load of four concrete panels from Derby to a construction site in Edinburgh.
The panels had been designed by VTK Structures Limited (VTK) and manufactured by Hanson Packed Products Limited (Hanson).
When Mr Hale arrived to collect the loaded trailer from Hanson’s yard, three vehicle straps supplied by Punchards had been used to secure the load into the trailer.
Shortly after starting his journey Mr Hale was contacted and asked to pull over to check his load. He was joined by employees from VTK (designers of the panels) who advised him to fit more straps.
When Mr Hale undid one of the existing straps, a panel weighing approximately one and a half tonnes fell off the trailer and killed him.
An investigation by the HSE into the incident found that the number of straps over the load were not sufficient to secure it safely for transport. All three companies should have cooperated to ensure that a safer means of securing concrete panels on the trailer were used.
Punchards Haulage Limited, of Bramshall Industrial Estate, Stone Road, Bramshall, Staffordshire were fined a total of £140,000, and ordered to pay costs of £37,016 after pleading guilty to an offence under Section 2(1) of the Health and Safety at Work etc. Act 1974.
VTK Structures Limited, of Mill Bay Lane, Horsham, West Sussex were fined a total of £140,000, and ordered to pay costs of £37,016 after pleading guilty to an offence under Section 3(1) of the Health and Safety at Work etc. Act 1974.
Hanson Packed Products Limited (Formerly known as Hanson Building Products Limited), of Hanson House, Castle Hill, Maidenhead, were fined a total of £80,000, and ordered to pay costs of £37,016 after pleading guilty to an offence under Regulation 3(1) of the Management of Health and Safety at Work Regulations 1999. 

Builder fined after sacks of rubble thrown from building window
A Coalville construction firm working in Leicester has been sentenced after workers were spotted throwing sacks of rubble from a building project opposite a police station.
Police officers called the HSE as debris was being launched out of a fifth floor window to a flat roof several metres below. They also saw unsafe working at open edges with no fall protection.
HSE inspectors arrived at the site on 2 October 2014 and witnessed the activity first hand and after investigating, prosecuted the firm.
J A Ball Ltd. was contracted to carry out work to refurbish former office space into flats at Allied Place, 44 Abbey Street, Leicester.
Leicester Magistrates’ Court was told company director Adam Ball decided soft stripping work should begin and walked the site with a worker who was not a site manager while issuing instructions.    
The court heard that Ball had not ensured a refurbishment and demolition asbestos survey had been carried out on the site before work commenced, and no paperwork was given to the worker regarding the methods to be used to carry out this work.
No risk assessments or site paperwork was given to Ball’s employee and no site file existed. There was a substantial amount of waste generated and placed into the rubble bags. These were initially taken down the stairs to the flat roof and then dragged across the flat roof and thrown over the edge into the skip at ground level.
The flat roof had a number of unprotected fragile roof lights across it and there was no edge protection on the flat roof. Mr Ball’s employees then decided it would quicker to simply throw the rubble bags out of the window while they were working on the fifth floor. So while standing on the window sill of an open window bags were thrown to the flat roof before being dragged to skip.
HSE told the court that Adam Ball had arranged for work to begin on a site without ensuring that the proper procedures had been followed, and that all workers had been given adequate information. He also made incorrect assumptions about his employee being competent to manage this project.
J A Ball Ltd, of Property Court, Telford Way, Stephenson Industrial Estate, Coalville admitted breaching of Regulation 4(1) of the Work at Height Regulations 2005 and was fined £13,000 with £1182.00 costs.
 
HSE Myth Busters: 

Bus Company separates boys and girls on school bus
Issue
A bus company providing contracted service to a school stated that they separated boys and girls on their school bus in order to comply with health and safety regulations.
Panel opinion
There is certainly no specific health and safety at work legislation that requires boys and girls to be separated on school buses. Bus operators do need to find practical ways to control rowdy behaviour however. This is primarily an issue of good discipline, and pupils moving about a bus or misbehaving can create real dangers for themselves, others on the bus and other road users if the driver is distracted.

Supermarket café unable to heat up mince pies
Issue
A supermarket café told a customer they were unable to heat up a mince pie they served for health and safety reasons.
Panel opinion
A clear case of "bah humbug" here. There are no health and safety rules which would prevent the counter staff responding to a perfectly reasonable request to heat up a mince pie. The store management have confirmed there is no central policy on this either so we hope the serving staff can get into the Christmas spirit soon.

No comments:

Post a Comment