Wednesday, 16 December 2015


Everyone at RHSS Ltd would like to wish you all a very Merry Christmas and a Happy (and safe) New Year!

Rob, Jack, Martin, David, Michael and Sarah


Blog will return in 2016.


HSE prosecution round up:

Worker killed by falling from ladder during boiler inspection
A sub-contractor was fined after a worker was killed when he fell from a ladder during an inspection of a boiler.
Winchester Magistrates’ Court heard how third party contractor, David Wood, (62 at the time of the accident), of Hampshire was inspecting a boiler in the loft space of a private residence. The ladder had been incorrectly fitted which resulted in Mr Woods falling and suffering fatal injuries.
An investigation by the HSE into the incident, which occurred on 19th March 2013, found that the sub-contractor Poitr Kowalczyk, who could not speak or read English and was not conversant with current British health and safety standards, was tasked with carrying out refurbishment and improvement works at the residence. This included fitting a propriety loft ladder. The ceiling, not being of a standard height was not compatible with either two or three section extendable ladders.
Piotr Kowalczyk chose to fit the longer three section ladder. However, due to the restricted loft space it was not possible to fit the retaining bar on the ladder. The retaining bar is a safety device that locks the ladder at a safe angle.
When Mr Wood was on the ladder, the omission of the retaining bar allowed the ladder to slide forward causing Mr Wood to fall backward to the floor below. This resulted in fatal head injuries.
Piotr Kowalczyk, of Howard Road, Southampton, was sentenced to six months imprisonment, suspended for two years and ordered to pay costs of £12,404 after pleading guilty to offences under Section 3(2) of the Health and Safety at Work etc Act 1974. 

Worker injured after falling through rooflight
A painting company has been fined after a worker fell through a roof light whilst working at height.
Cwmbran Magistrates’ Court heard the employee working for Williams Contractors Limited of Pontypridd, was carrying out painting work when he fell off a Youngman board and through the roof lights.
He suffered a broken left wrist and injuries to his chest, back hip and leg and was unable to work for six months.
An investigation by the HSE into the incident, which occurred in August 2013, at A Schulman Incorporated Limited, Crumlin, Newport, found that there was poor planning and supervision of the task and an unsafe method of work.
Williams Contractors Limited, of Gelliwastad Road, Pontypridd, was fined a total of £12,000 and ordered to pay costs of £1,069 after pleading guilty to an offence under Regulation 4(1) of the Work at Height Regulations 2005. 

Tradesman fined after employee lost fingers
Richard John Pullinger, a sole trader that recycles cardboard in Polesworth, was fined after a 19-year-old employee suffered severe damage to his left hand when it was drawn into a roller press that had no guards on it.
Nuneaton Magistrates Court heard that the employee, Wade Moore, who had only been working for Mr Pullinger for three weeks, had his hand on top of cardboard as it was being drawn into the rollers. There was no emergency stop button on the machine but another operator realised what had happened and put the machine quickly into reverse mode.
Wade lost a third of his fifth finger, part of his ring finger and thumb, had multiple fractures and lacerations of his hand and needed a five hour operation to limit the damage. He still requires physiotherapy treatment and has had a further operation on his thumb.
An investigation by the HSE found that the machine was at least 26-years-old and was in a poor state of repair. A prohibition notice was immediately issued after the incident and a guard was fitted to the machine days later.
Richard John Pullinger trading at Unit 5A Pooley Hall Farm Pooley Lane, Polesworth, was fined £13,000 and was ordered to pay £6,143 in costs after he pleaded guilty to a Contravention of Regulation 11(1) of the Provision and Use of Work Equipment Regulations 1998 as effective measures had not been taken to prevent access to the dangerous parts of the roller press. 

Company fined after scaffolding blown over during dismantling
A scaffolding company was fined after scaffolding hit a bus and pedestrians when it blew over during dismantling.
Leicester Magistrates’ Court heard how on 28 January 2015, Emperor Scaffolding Limited of Leicester was dismantling scaffolding on Charles Street when the incident occurred. The scaffolding hit a bus, landed on a parked van and hit two members of the public.
An investigation by the HSE into the incident found that the company was not following a safe system of work. The scaffolding was not tied to the building and sheeting was left in place. The scaffolding dismantling took place over four days and the workers failed to check the scaffolding condition before they started or to take adequate measures to correct defects and ensure it would not collapse during the dismantling.
Emperor Scaffolding Limited, of Fairefield Crescent, Glenfield, Leicester, was fined a total of £8,000, with costs of £2,000 after pleading guilty to offences under Regulation 28(1) of the Construction (Design and Management) Regulations. 

Construction firm fined over unsafe work practises during refurbishment
J B Barbour and Co Ltd has been fined after a worker was killed when he was struck by a falling signage and fascia assembly during shop fitting work at a retail unit.
On the 6 July 2011, the 26-year-old employee, Michael Kelly, was clearing debris from the dismantling of shop front units, when the fastenings to the signage and fascia suspended above Mr Kelly failed causing one end to drop down to the shop floor level striking Mr Kelly and causing fatal injuries.
The HSE investigation found that the company failed to properly assess the supporting arrangements for the signage and fascia assuming they were supported by steel hangers and that it would be safe to remove the shop fronts.
Stafford Crown Court heard that the incident could have been prevented if work had been properly planned, assessed and supervised. The company’s own method statement had sufficient information to implement some control measures that could have prevented the incident, but neither the site team nor management team recognised the need to follow their own guidance after receiving a holding request had been made by their client that affected the sequence of work.
J B Barbour and Co Limited of Lawmoor Street, Dixons Blazes Industrial Estate, Glasgow pleaded guilty to breaching Section 2 (1) and Section 3 (1) of the Health and Safety at Work Act 1974 and was fined £85,000 with £89,053 costs. 

Three companies fined after worker lost his life
Three companies have been fined for safety failings after a concrete panel fell from a lorry and killed a worker.
Derby Crown Court heard how on 11 January 2011 Mr Travis Hale, 45, was employed as a driver by Punchards Haulage Limited (Punchards) to transport a load of four concrete panels from Derby to a construction site in Edinburgh.
The panels had been designed by VTK Structures Limited (VTK) and manufactured by Hanson Packed Products Limited (Hanson).
When Mr Hale arrived to collect the loaded trailer from Hanson’s yard, three vehicle straps supplied by Punchards had been used to secure the load into the trailer.
Shortly after starting his journey Mr Hale was contacted and asked to pull over to check his load. He was joined by employees from VTK (designers of the panels) who advised him to fit more straps.
When Mr Hale undid one of the existing straps, a panel weighing approximately one and a half tonnes fell off the trailer and killed him.
An investigation by the HSE into the incident found that the number of straps over the load were not sufficient to secure it safely for transport. All three companies should have cooperated to ensure that a safer means of securing concrete panels on the trailer were used.
Punchards Haulage Limited, of Bramshall Industrial Estate, Stone Road, Bramshall, Staffordshire were fined a total of £140,000, and ordered to pay costs of £37,016 after pleading guilty to an offence under Section 2(1) of the Health and Safety at Work etc. Act 1974.
VTK Structures Limited, of Mill Bay Lane, Horsham, West Sussex were fined a total of £140,000, and ordered to pay costs of £37,016 after pleading guilty to an offence under Section 3(1) of the Health and Safety at Work etc. Act 1974.
Hanson Packed Products Limited (Formerly known as Hanson Building Products Limited), of Hanson House, Castle Hill, Maidenhead, were fined a total of £80,000, and ordered to pay costs of £37,016 after pleading guilty to an offence under Regulation 3(1) of the Management of Health and Safety at Work Regulations 1999. 

Builder fined after sacks of rubble thrown from building window
A Coalville construction firm working in Leicester has been sentenced after workers were spotted throwing sacks of rubble from a building project opposite a police station.
Police officers called the HSE as debris was being launched out of a fifth floor window to a flat roof several metres below. They also saw unsafe working at open edges with no fall protection.
HSE inspectors arrived at the site on 2 October 2014 and witnessed the activity first hand and after investigating, prosecuted the firm.
J A Ball Ltd. was contracted to carry out work to refurbish former office space into flats at Allied Place, 44 Abbey Street, Leicester.
Leicester Magistrates’ Court was told company director Adam Ball decided soft stripping work should begin and walked the site with a worker who was not a site manager while issuing instructions.    
The court heard that Ball had not ensured a refurbishment and demolition asbestos survey had been carried out on the site before work commenced, and no paperwork was given to the worker regarding the methods to be used to carry out this work.
No risk assessments or site paperwork was given to Ball’s employee and no site file existed. There was a substantial amount of waste generated and placed into the rubble bags. These were initially taken down the stairs to the flat roof and then dragged across the flat roof and thrown over the edge into the skip at ground level.
The flat roof had a number of unprotected fragile roof lights across it and there was no edge protection on the flat roof. Mr Ball’s employees then decided it would quicker to simply throw the rubble bags out of the window while they were working on the fifth floor. So while standing on the window sill of an open window bags were thrown to the flat roof before being dragged to skip.
HSE told the court that Adam Ball had arranged for work to begin on a site without ensuring that the proper procedures had been followed, and that all workers had been given adequate information. He also made incorrect assumptions about his employee being competent to manage this project.
J A Ball Ltd, of Property Court, Telford Way, Stephenson Industrial Estate, Coalville admitted breaching of Regulation 4(1) of the Work at Height Regulations 2005 and was fined £13,000 with £1182.00 costs.
 
HSE Myth Busters: 

Bus Company separates boys and girls on school bus
Issue
A bus company providing contracted service to a school stated that they separated boys and girls on their school bus in order to comply with health and safety regulations.
Panel opinion
There is certainly no specific health and safety at work legislation that requires boys and girls to be separated on school buses. Bus operators do need to find practical ways to control rowdy behaviour however. This is primarily an issue of good discipline, and pupils moving about a bus or misbehaving can create real dangers for themselves, others on the bus and other road users if the driver is distracted.

Supermarket café unable to heat up mince pies
Issue
A supermarket café told a customer they were unable to heat up a mince pie they served for health and safety reasons.
Panel opinion
A clear case of "bah humbug" here. There are no health and safety rules which would prevent the counter staff responding to a perfectly reasonable request to heat up a mince pie. The store management have confirmed there is no central policy on this either so we hope the serving staff can get into the Christmas spirit soon.

Monday, 7 December 2015



Picture of the week - a (not) so good example of safe use of ladders and working at height! 

Health & Safety in the new this week: 

House collapse in London

A property in Barnes, south-west London collapsed last week whilst undergoing a basement excavation.
The six-bedroom, terraced house was reportedly being renovated in order to create a basement for a cinema, gym and wine room.
No one was reported to have been hurt.
The incident has reignited the debate around basement excavations.  The Richmond campaign group Safer Basements wrote to Councillors asking them to halt any basement excavation applications following the “disastrous events” in Barnes.
The group posted the letter on its website, stating: "All over Barnes there are examples of substantial damage to properties including walls moving and cracking, doors and windows jamming, ceiling collapse, gas pipes moving and leaking, pumps malfunctioning and water rushing into cavities and so on.
"How much more collective damage is needed before our concerns are taken seriously?
"Whilst today’s events were dramatic and severe, we are not unfortunately surprised that one of these structures would at some point collapse."

Health & Safety investigation into another near-miss incident at central Manchester building site
Construction company bosses insist a building site for a premier Manchester city centre development is safe after materials plunged to the ground while being moved by a crane.
The incident was at the McLaren XYZ building site next to the Manchester Civil Justice Centre.
In addition to this, it was recently reported how one man had a lucky escape in an incident when a metal beam plunged from the same site and narrowly missed him.
It has also emerged there had been an earlier incident when a crane's load was caught by wind and blown into a column.
Alan Blanchett, director of safety for McLaren Construction, said: “On October 7th 2015, a lifting operation was being undertaken, with a formwork table being lifted after a previous concrete pour, when a gust of wind caused the jib of the crane to slew to the right causing the load to follow.
“The load swung in a pendulum motion and hit a column causing a formwork beam and two sections of plywood to be dislodged and fall to the ground, within the pre-determined exclusion zone that had been set up and manned.
“Following this a full investigation was instigated. Representations were also made to the HSE, who requested information in regards to the incident. The HSE concluded that the case was closed and that they would be taking no further action at this time.”
During the previous incident, a member of the public was in the area when a two-metre long metal beam fell from the site.

After that incident McLaren says it launched an investigation and suspended all work on the site.
It found that the falling beam was caused by a member of staff who has now been disciplined. The firm says it has also brought in additional safety measures to ensure it can’t happen again.
Mr Blanchett said at the time it was first time that such an occurrence has happened on one of their sites in 20 years of carrying out such operations.
He added: “McLaren is committed to the highest standards of health and safety and enforces the most stringent working practices across all of its construction sites.”

HSE prosecution round up:
 
Construction firm fined after worker suffers cement burns

A construction firm was fined after a 54-year-old employee suffered severe cement burns to his knees while laying concrete flooring. 

Sefton Magistrates’ Court heard that on the 26 November 2014, an employee of DLP Services (Northern) Limited, kneeled in wet concrete to manually finish the concrete flooring being laid in a domestic bungalow. The cement burns to both his knees resulted in 12 days hospitalisation and ongoing treatment.

The HSE investigation found the firm failed to adequately asses the risks and implement suitable and sufficient control measures to protect employees from contact of the wet concrete with the skin. In addition, it did not provide suitable Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) and there were no welfare facilities on site. 

The court heard the company had been served with HSE Improvement Notices for lack of welfare facilities in September 2014 and June 2014. 

DLP Services (Northern) Limited of Cobden Street, Brindle Heath Industrial Estate, Pendleton, Salford, pleaded guilty to breaching Section 22 (1)(c) of the Construction (Design and Management) Regulations and Regulation 7(1) of the Control of Substances Hazardous to Health Regulations. The company was fined £14,000 with £1,590 costs. 
 

Demolition firm fined after worker falls from height
A demolition company has been sentenced after pleading guilty to health and safety failings following a worker’s fall from height.
The incident happened at the Hillington Industrial Estate in Glasgow on the 30 December 2011, when the 50-year-old worker was carrying out work from a mobile scaffolding platform to enable the building to be demolished.
It appears that a cable tray swung towards the worker as he was cutting it from the ceiling, hitting him in the shin and knocking him off balance. He fell five feet off the platform causing severe injuries. He fractured his right elbow and fractured his left arm, which required surgery, and also suffered bruising to his head. He has been unable to return to work because of the extent of his injuries.
The HSE’s investigation found that his fall happened because the platform was not put together correctly and was missing guard rails and toeboards. Also no suitable risk assessment was available on site for the use of the mobile scaffolding platform and it had not been inspected before use.
DSR Demolition Limited was fined £5,000 after pleading guilty to breaching Regulation 6(3) of the Work at Height Regulations 2005 and Section 33(1)(c) of the Health and Safety at Work Act 1974.

Construction company Director fined after worker’s ladder fall

The director of a construction company has been fined for safety failings after a worker fell from a ladder resulting in life-changing injuries.
Portsmouth Magistrates’ Court heard an employee of MP Jacobs fell from a ladder whilst replacing guttering on a two-storey block of residential flats at Totton Walk, Havant, on 29 October 2014.
The 30-year-old fractured his skull, broke his collar bone and suffered a brain haemorrhage. His injuries caused brain damage and he continues to have problems with memory and tinnitus. He is still attending hospital and is unable to work.
Martin Paul Jacobs, director of MP Jacobs Limited, of Edgell Road, Emsworth, was sentenced in Portsmouth Crown Court and was fined a total of £5,000 and ordered to pay £5,004 in costs after pleading guilty to an offence under Section 37 of The Health and Safety at Work etc Act 1974. He was also given a six-month custodial sentence, suspended for 12 months. 

Unlicensed company removes asbestos ceiling from school
A construction firm removed an asbestos ceiling in a school despite not being legally approved to do the work.
Luton Magistrates’ Court heard that Clarks Construction Limited were contracted by the Board of Governors of Caddington Village School to refurbish changing rooms, toilets and associated areas at the school complex.
The school had arranged for a specific refurbishment survey to be carried out for the presence of asbestos. The survey identified the presence of asbestos in a ceiling of one of the rooms. Clarks Construction Limited removed the ceiling in August 2013 without consultation with the school or effective reference to the asbestos survey.
Clarks Construction Limited, of Windsor Street, Luton, was fined a total of £3,300, and ordered to pay £662 in costs after pleading guilty to a breach of Regulation 8(1) of the Control of Asbestos Regulations 2012 for carrying out the work which, given the inherent level of risk involved, requires a licensed contractor. 

Company fined after failure to act on asbestos risks
An engineering firm has been fined after asbestos was found at their factory and they failed to document or manage the risks to employees or visitors to the site.
Darlington Magistrates’ Court heard how Blue Diamond Engineering Limited of County Durham was notified of the presence of asbestos materials during a survey carried out at the company’s factory premises in 2006.
Work undertaken at the premises had the potential to disturb the hazardous asbestos materials, and until HSE’s intervention, the company had not documented or implemented an Asbestos Management Plan to adequately control the risk of exposure.
Blue Diamond Engineering Limited, of Shildon Industrial Estate, Shildon, was fined a total of £11,000, with costs of £1,610 after pleading guilty to offences under Regulation 4(8)(b) of the Control of Asbestos Regulations 2012. 

Construction site manager fined for safety failings
A construction site manager was fined for safety failings after a worker was injured while working at height. 
St Albans Magistrates’ Court heard Edwin Heaney failed to take reasonable care of colleagues while operating a construction site vehicle on a house build site on Loom Lane, Radlett, Hertfordshire. He used an excavator to raise a site worker to access work at height to cut a protruding piece of steel. 
The court was told Mr Heaney left the operator’s cabin of the excavator, leaving the machine unattended whilst the worker continued to use a handheld grinder. The bucket suddenly jolted downwards throwing the worker off balance. He managed to throw the grinder clear and grabbed onto the adjacent wall to stop his fall. Another colleague then provided a ladder to allow him to get down safely. 
The worker suffered a number of strain injuries, in particular to his right shoulder. 
An investigation was carried out by the HSE and it was found that Mr Heaney had failed to take reasonable care for the health and safety of others, the excavator was not suitable equipment for lifting the worker and the bucket attachment was an inadequate work platform. 
Edwin Heaney, 43, of How Wood, Park Street, Hertfordshire was fined £1,000 and was ordered to pay £3,130 in costs for breaching Section 7(a) of the Health and Safety at Work Act. 

HSE Myth Busters: 
Lollypop lady banned from waving at cars
Issue
A school Lollipop lady has been banned from waving at cars by her bosses after one complaint by a member of the public.

Panel opinion
Whilst no-one wants to be killjoy, ‘lollipop’ men and women do have a very important job to do in helping manage road safety risks for schoolchildren. They need to pay full care and attention – both for their own safety and that of the children. We are fully in favour of a smile and a kind word, but potentially misleading hand gestures or a loss of attention could have serious consequences. On balance, we feel that the company was right to intervene and did so in a proportionate way in this instance.

Odd-job person not allowed to change light bulbs
Issue
Management Company advised that odd job person is unable to change light bulbs as they would only be protected from negligence if a competent electrician carried out the job.

Panel opinion
Health and safety at work legislation does not require the use of a competent electrician to change light bulbs in a residential property. Confusing a perceived (but in all probability low) risk of being sued for negligence with the requirements of health and safety legislation is unhelpful, and can distort the aim of the legislation, which is to ensure a proportionate approach to managing risks.