Tuesday 1 November 2016


Health and Safety in the news this week

Devastating Fire at the Country’s Oldest Hotel

Firefighters are still tackling the remaining hotspots at the historic coaching inn after the blaze broke out above the nearby Castle Fine Art gallery on Friday 28th October.
Structural engineers were meeting on Sunday 30th October to discuss how to demolish parts of the hotel after flames gutted the interior and left the frontage on the brink of collapse.  It is not known when the demolition will take place.

Crews are unable to enter the building because it is too unstable and have instead been using aerial ladder platforms to tackle the remaining pockets of fire.
The Bishop of Exeter said:

“All the historic stuff inside has gone, you can't replace it, but at least I hope and pray that they rebuild the frontage as it was because it deserves to be there because that's what will preserve at least the veneer of the architectural continuity on the Cathedral Green".
He said it was "deeply, deeply sad" to see the hotel - which escaped the 1942 Blitz by German bomber planes - in ruins, but said the damage could have been "a lot worse" to neighbouring buildings if the wind direction was different.

Around 150 firefighters from across Devon, Cornwall and Somerset tackled the blaze at its height - pumping water from the River Exe to put it out.
Local residents were asked to restrict their water use to make as much as possible available for use by emergency services.

The Bishop said the cathedral was covered in "black acrid smoke" from the fire, while the gas supply was turned off after a ruptured gas main was found to be fuelling the flames.
The fire service said their teams were "still working hard at the Royal Clarence", and added: "They are controlling "hotspots" and monitoring the building structure."


Jail sentence for construction skills card cheat

A Luton man has been jailed for 18 months and recommended for deportation for illegally working in the UK and cheating to obtain industry skills cards.
Indian national, Manjit Multani, paid someone to sit the health and safety tests required to obtain the Construction Skills Certification Scheme card and Construction Plant Certification Scheme card.

A Construction Industry Training Board investigation found he was using the cards to work on building sites across London and Milton Keynes.
Multani also used a number of fake names in order to work illegally in the UK.

He was arrested by Home Office Immigration Enforcement officers in February but failed to answer his bail.
He was then arrested again on motoring offences when they discovered he was wanted by police.

He pleaded guilty in Luton Crown Court to eight charges including misuse of identity documents and fraudulently obtaining leave to remain in the UK.
Ian Sidney, Fraud Investigator at the CITB led the investigation into Multani’s cards and qualifications and immediately revoked his CPCS card in February after the tip off from the Home Office.  He assisted the Home Office with their investigation and provided a witness statement which was considered during sentencing.

He said: “The risks these people pose when illegally working in the construction industry are huge, so it’s encouraging to see that those who do brought to justice.  Fraud is incredibly damaging to the reputation of the industry and worse, it puts people’s lives in jeopardy.  Building sites can be hazardous if workers do not have the relevant training and qualifications, so it is lucky one was injured. We simply will not tolerate any illegal activities and will continue to work with the police to prosecute fraudsters.”
Source: www.constructionenquirer.com

Number of directors prosecuted by HSE trebles in a year
The number of company directors who have been prosecuted for health and safety offences has trebled in a year, according to research from a law firm.

Using data from the Health and Safety Executive (HSE), Clyde & Co’s research shows that the number of company directors and managers prosecuted by the HSE in the year to 31 March 2016 was 46, compared to 15 in the previous year.
In contrast, the number of employees who were prosecuted by the HSE in 2015/16 has fallen from 10 in the previous year, to just one.

Of the 46 prosecutions in 2015/16, 34 were found guilty and 12 were given prison sentences, with the longest prison sentence imposed at two years.
Fines on the increase

Following the introduction of the sentencing guidelines in February this year, the value of fines imposed by the HSE is also on the rise.
The total value of fines imposed has risen by 43 per cent compared to the same period last year.

Between February 2016 and August 2016, health and safety fines totalled £20.6 million, compared to £14.4 million in February 2015 to August 2015.  However, the HSE figures don’t include sentences imposed in cases prosecuted by local authorities.
In the past few weeks alone there have been a number of high value, high profile fines, including:

Clyde & Co said: “After decades of relatively stable and predictable fines, the tide is now rising rapidly as the new guideline is applied by the criminal courts.

The worrying thing for company directors is that fines are now routinely hitting the £1 million mark for non-fatal offences and even those where nobody has been injured meaning that any breach of the Health and Safety at Work Act is now potentially a serious threat to a company’s bottom line.”
The sentencing guidelines for health and safety, corporate manslaughter, food safety and hygiene offences came into force following a consultation in 2015. The size of fine given depends on the size of the company, the level of culpability of the company and the harm caused.

Clyde & Co’s analysis of the sentencing trend suggests that “medium” sized organisations – those with a turnover of between £10m–£50m – are feeling the biggest impact at the moment.
They commented: “The definitive guideline on sentencing health and safety matters is biting hard, but there is unquestionably more pain to come. We already know the Court of Appeal has paved the way for fines equal to 100 per cent of a business’ pre-tax net profit with what appears to be a desire to bring regulatory criminal fines in line with financial services fines.”

In June 2015, the Court of Appeal delivered a judgement in a case against Thames Water Utilities Ltd to uphold a £250,000 fine for polluting a nature reserve.
Clyde & Co argues that this sends a warning that convicted companies should expect fines to be in the millions of pounds where repeated operational failures occur.

Simon Joyston-Bechal, director, Turnstone Law, argued last year that very large companies (those whose turnover very greatly exceeds £50m) could face fines in excess of £100m.
Clyde & Co urged directors to pay attention to the fines being imposed: “Whilst health and safety has for many years featured prominently on many Board Meeting agendas, time spent on the point has not necessarily been significant. However, with the risk of turnover related health and safety fines now being so large, they are now material from an accounting and governance perspective which demands that all directors, executive and non-executive alike, sit up and take note.”


HSE prosecution round up:
Worker seriously injured in mobile platform fall

A Buckinghamshire waste equipment maintenance firm has been fined after a worker suffered serious head injuries when a mobile elevating work platform (MEWP) overturned.
Geoffrey Hatton, 49, from County Durham, was in the process of dismantling a compactor at a site in Wilmslow, Cheshire when the incident occurred on the 19th January 2015.

Minshull Street Crown Court heard that Mr Hatton, who was in the MEWP, and a colleague, were taking large pieces of cladding off the frame of a compactor. A large piece of the cladding came into contact with the MEWP and caused it to fall over.  Mr Hatton fractured his skull and two ribs in the incident and spent two months in hospital.
An investigation by the Health and Safety Executive (HSE) found serious safety failings by Cole Mechanical Services Ltd. The MEWP was being used outside when it was only suitable for internal work, the firm’s employees were not trained in how to use MEWPS or how to safely erect tower scaffolding, and no risk assessment had been conducted for the work being carried out.  In addition, at the time of the incident another worker was working on a fragile roof with no protection to prevent falls.

Cole Mechanical Services Ltd of Ashbridge Road, Chesham, Buckinghamshire pleaded guilty to a breach of Section 2(1) of the Health and Safety at Work etc Act 1974 and was fined £30,000 and ordered to pay costs of £8995.00.
Farming and drilling contractors fined after mast strikes power line

Two Norfolk-based companies have been fined after a worker suffered life-changing injuries following an overhead power line strike.
Norwich Crown Court heard that L F Papworth Ltd and T W Page & Son Ltd had organised drilling work for the purposes of crop irrigation at Felmingham, Norfolk.

On 29 April 2014 Jonathan Howes, an employee of T W Page & Son Ltd, was operating the controls of a lorry mounted drilling rig. A colleague moved the lorry and its mast came into contact with an 11kV power line over a field. Mr Howes suffered serious injury including extensive burns to his scalp, arms, legs and feet and loss of two toes.
A Health and Safety Executive (HSE) investigation into the incident found that neither company had taken effective precautions to prevent work equipment, including the mast of the drilling rig, which was capable of extending to a height greater than that of the powerlines, from coming into contact with them.

L F Papworth Ltd of Felmingham, Norfolk pleaded guilty to a breach of Section 3(1) of the Health and Safety at Work etc Act 1974 and was fined £134,000 with £6484.45 costs.
T W Page & Son Ltd of Frettenham, Norfolk pleaded guilty to a breach of Section 2(1) of the Health and Safety at Work etc Act 1974 and was fined £80,400 with £6596.05 costs.

After the hearing, HSE Inspector Jessica Churchyard said:
“This tragic incident has had devastating consequences for Jonathan Howes and his family.  Similar incidents involving overhead power line strikes remain all too common in Great Britain and are almost always entirely avoidable.  Duty holders planning, organising and carrying out such work must ensure that site-specific risks are identified and controlled. Where hazardous electrical conductors need to be kept live, workers and equipment must be kept at a safe distance from them.  Here, no effective precautions were implemented and workers were put at potentially lethal risk with Mr Howes suffering injuries which will affect him for the rest of his life.”


 

No comments:

Post a Comment