Monday 30 January 2017


Health and Safety in the news this week
Steep rise in health and safety fines



The largest UK fines for health and safety incidents have increased substantially in the past year, with some of the biggest brands in business having to pay millions of pounds for failing to control serious risks to employees and the public.
There were 19 fines of £1 million or more in 2016 - the largest being £5 million. This compares with three fines of £1 million or more in 2015 and none in 2014.

The rise in fines is a result of the introduction of new sentencing guidelines for health and safety offences, which came into force on 1 February 2016.
It is hoped that the possibility of larger penalties will make employers take greater care to ensure people are not harmed by their activities, according to the Institution of Occupational Safety and Health (IOSH). This, IOSH says, can in turn help businesses become more successful.

Shelley Frost, Executive Director of Policy at IOSH, said:
"Health and safety offences can ruin lives, devastate families and inhibit precious talent.

Whilst you cannot put a value on human life, the level of fines now being handed out recognises society's disapproval of serious corporate failures that lead to injury, illness and death. It reflects a desire to deter others from making the same errors and takes significant steps forward in aligning penalties for these offences with other regulatory breaches in the UK.
Protecting employees and others affected by a business's operations will not only eliminate the risk of a large financial penalty but can also be key to ensuring and maintaining an organisation's strong reputation and ultimately contributing to its success."

For the first anniversary of this change in legal guidance for the courts, IOSH, in association with Osborne Clarke LLP's specialist health and safety legal team, has revealed the results of a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request exploring the impact of the new sentencing guidelines.
This shows that the largest 20 fines imposed for health and safety offences last year cost the businesses involved a total of £38.6 million. In comparison, the largest 20 fines in 2015 and 2014 cost £13.5 million and £4.3 million respectively.

Not every fine in 2016's largest 20 involved a fatality, with the guidelines deeming that it is enough for a company's health and safety failings to have caused injury, or put people at substantial risk of injury or death, to warrant a large financial penalty.
For example, the largest fine was the £5 million that Merlin Entertainments was ordered to pay after five people were seriously hurt in a rollercoaster crash at its Alton Towers theme park. Following the sentencing, the organisation said its focus on safety is "sharper and more engrained than ever".

The broken leg and dislocated ankle suffered by actor Harrison Ford while filming Star Wars: the Force Awakens resulted in a £1.6 million fine for Foodles Production. The Health and Safety Executive said it could have resulted in more serious injury or even death. Foodles stated:
"The safety of our cast and crew was always a top priority and we deeply regret this unfortunate on-set accident. The Court acknowledged both the additional safety protocols that were immediately implemented, and that it was a very safe production in all other respects."

Most fines imposed by courts in 2016 related to health and safety offences which took place before the guidelines were introduced.
A partner at law firm Osborne Clarke LLP specialising in health and safety, said:

"The increase in fines being issued by the courts demonstrates a desire to drive the message home that ensuring health and safety within a working environment is fundamental. So while fines regularly exceeded the million pound mark last year, we can expect to see even larger fines going forward.
I see many businesses who focus on the safety and health of employees and others experiencing a broad range of benefits, including being better placed to attract and retain talent, scoring points in procurement processes for valuable contracts or even when seeking external investment."

Before the introduction of the guidelines, there was little assistance for courts sentencing health and safety offences.
The 2016 guidelines, a 40-plus page document, provide a step-by-step guide for sentencing both companies and individuals for health and safety, and food, offences. This includes taking into account the turnover of the organisation, the level of culpability and the likelihood that the failing could lead to harm and how bad the harm could be.

Source: www.iosh.co.uk

HSE prosecution round up:
Worker exposed to high level of carbon monoxide

A Construction firm was sentenced today for safety breaches after workers were exposed to carbon monoxide and other substances hazardous to health.
Hull Magistrates Court heard how, in October 2015, the workers were using a petrol powered saw to cut out an existing concrete floor at a fish factory in Hull. In order to protect the food factory surfaces from dust they constructed a sealed enclosure from timber and polythene. The workers were inside the area working over a weekend, the space was not ventilated and there was a build-up of carbon monoxide, which lead to one worker being hospitalised.

An investigation by the Health and Safety Executive found the company had not planned the work or thought through the dangers an un-ventilated tent would cause. The company should have used a system of dust suppression and local exhaust ventilation (LEV) together with appropriate respiratory protective equipment to prevent or reduce exposure to harmful dust.
Westlands Construction Ltd, Sproatley, Hull pleaded guilty to breaching Section 3 (1) of the Health and Safety at Work Act 1974 and was fined £16,000 with £847.30 costs by Hull Magistrates Court.

After the hearing, HSE inspector Jennifer Elsegood commented: “Petrol driven saws should not be used in a confined space because of the risk of carbon monoxide exposure. Carbon monoxide is extremely dangerous it has no smell and workers can be overcome by the fumes before they realise they have been affected – making it extremely dangerous. This is why it is known as the silent killer.”

Three construction companies fined after worker fall
Three companies from Essex have been fined after a worker fell over seven metres through a fragile roof he was replacing.

Chelmsford Crown Court heard how Rafal Myslim was standing on the fragile roof at Dengie Crops Ltd in Asheldem, when the asbestos sheeting gave way and he fell 7.5m onto a concrete floor, hitting a number of pipes within the building on the way down. There was no safety netting or other protective equipment to prevent him from falling and he suffered a hematoma on the brain.

An investigation by the Health and Safety Executive found three companies at fault for the fall. Dengie Crops Ltd contracted Ernest Doe & Sons Ltd, who are an agricultural machinery supplier, to help the company replace their roof.  Ernest Doe & Sons Ltd did not have the appropriate experience and subcontracted the work to Balsham (Buildings) Ltd who worked out how the roof replacement should take place.  Balsham then subcontracted the actual replacement of the roof to Strong Clad Ltd.
Ernest Doe & Sons Ltd were unable to act effectively in their role as principal contractor because they had no experience of working in construction. They could not effectively oversee Balsham (Buildings) Ltd plans that had highlighted the risk of a fall. None of the parties involved put in place safety measures for 40% of the roof that did not have netting below. They relied too heavily on the verbal briefings to workers reminding them of where the netting was rather than putting in place effective safety measures for the whole roof.

Ernest Doe & sons Ltd, of Ulting, Essex, pleaded guilty to breaching Regulation 22 of the Construction (Design and Management) Regulations 2007. They were fined £360,000 and ordered to pay costs of £10,000
Balsham (Buildings) Ltd, of Balsham, Cambridge, pleaded guilty to breaching 4(1)(a) and 4(1)(c) of the Work at Height Regulation 2005. They were fined £45,000 and ordered to pay costs of £7,000

Strong Clad Ltd, of Castle Hedingham, Essex, pleaded guilty to breaching 4(1)(a) and 4(1)(c) of the Work at Height Regulation 2005. They were fined £7,000 and ordered to pay costs of £3,000
HSE inspector Adam Hills said:

“The dangers of working on fragile roofs are well documented. Every year too many people are killed or seriously injured due to falls from height while carrying out this work.
Work at height requires adequate planning, organisation and communication between all parties. This incident was entirely preventable and Mr Myslim is lucky to be alive.”

Unregistered gas fitter fined
An unregistered gas fitter from Farnborough has been prosecuted for carrying out illegal gas work which was found to be unsafe.

Basingstoke Magistrates’ court heard how Mr Leask, who also trades as Eldan Plumbing, had assured the homeowner that he was Gas Safe Registered. When he was unable to supply the gas safe certificate months after installing the boiler, the homeowner contacted Gas Safe, who confirmed Mr Leask was not gas safe registered. When inspected by the Gas Safe Register the boiler was found to be ‘at risk’, which indicates a risk to life or property.
Mr Leask pleaded guilty to breaching Regulation 3(3) of the Gas Safety (Installation and Use) Regulations 1998, for carrying out gas work without being gas safe registered and Regulation 3(7) for falsely pretending to be gas safe registered.

He was fined £1230 and ordered to pay costs of £350.


 

 

Monday 23 January 2017


Health and Safety in the news this week
British man dies working on Qatar World Cup stadium

A British man has died after falling off a suspended platform while working on a World Cup stadium in Qatar.  Construction conditions have come under sharp scrutiny since the country was awarded the 2022 football tournament.
The man, 40, reportedly fell when the platform, used to manage sound and lighting, collapsed at the Khalifa International Stadium on Thursday last week, its construction firm contractor said. The man’s safety harness was said to have been cut during the fall.

The project to renovate the stadium, which is described by organisers as “Qatar’s most historic stadium,” is being supervised by Belgian Company Besix in partnership with local company Midmac Contracting.
A statement from construction firm Midmac-Six Construct said that a lever hoist supporting the platform failed “for unknown reasons”, adding that it was working with the local authorities to investigate.

“All of the partners involved in this project are devastated by such a tragic loss of life and we extend our deepest condolences to the victim’s family, friends and colleagues,” the statement said.
Rights group Amnesty International says it is the second death reported by the organisers related to a workplace incident at a Qatar stadium in the last three months.

Labour’s shadow sports minister Rosena Allin-Khan said:
“FIFA and the Qatari authorities are putting profit before safety.  My thoughts go out to the friends and family of the person who tragically died working on a construction site in Qatar.  It is unacceptable that basic health and safety precautions are not being followed. FIFA and the Qatari authorities should not be putting profit before safety.  FIFA President Gianni Infantino needs to show where his priorities lie, launch an urgent investigation and ensure everything is done to protect workers.”

HSE prosecution round up:
Crisp Company fined for safety failings

A Northamptonshire company who manufacture crisps and snacks has been fined after an agency worker lost the tops of three fingers.
Northampton Crown Court heard how an agency worker, working at Tayto Group Limited was clearing a blockage of material from a machine on the production line.

The worker’s hand came into contact with shears and three fingers on his right hand were severed below the first knuckle.
An investigation by the Health and Safety Executive (HSE) into the incident, which occurred in August 2015, found that the guard on the machine was not secured at the time of the incident. The Company had not implemented a formal monitoring system on this machine to ensure that all guards were in place and secure, before the machine was started.

Tayto Group Limited, of Princewood Road, Earlstrees Industrial Estate, Corby, Northamptonshire, pleaded guilty to breaching Regulation 5 of the Provision and Use of Work Equipment Regulations 1998 (PUWER), and was fined £330,000 and ordered to pay costs of £11,752.23.
After the hearing, HSE Inspector Michelle Morrison said:
‘This man suffered a life-changing injury in what was an entirely preventable incident. Employers must have adequate and robust systems to ensure that guards used to prevent access to dangerous parts of machinery are in place and secure before machinery is put into use.’

Jaguar Land Rover fined £900,000 after worker injured
National car manufacturer Jaguar Land Rover has been fined after a worker lost their leg following a car accident.

Birmingham Crown Court heard that on Sunday 8 February 2015 at Jaguar’s Lode Lane plant in Solihull, a Range Rover Sport vehicle was driven toward the start of the production line, an event that normally happens 48 times an hour. On this occasion the delivery driver lost control of the car and collided with the rear of another vehicle he had just delivered, causing a 4 car shunt.
At the same time a worker was crossing the production line and became trapped between the second and third cars. His injuries resulted in amputation of his right leg above the knee.  Two other employees also suffered minor injuries.

The investigation by the Health and Safety Executive found that the company had failed to ensure that the driver of the Range Rover, who was covering the shift, was familiar with procedures. They had also failed to properly separate the workers on the production line from the moving vehicles.
Jaguar Land Rover, were found guilty of breaching Section 2 of the Health and Safety at Work etc. Act 1974 and fined £900,000 and ordered to pay costs of £49,800.

HSE inspector John Glynn said:
“A worker has been left with life changing injuries that were completely avoidable, it was only good fortune that prevented this from being a fatal accident. Jaguar Land Rover knew the risks of driving vehicles onto production lines and the possibility of shunt accidents, but failed to protect their workers.”
Asbestos Analyst fined for falsifying documents

An asbestos analyst has been fined after he falsified an asbestos air clearance certificate, following licensed asbestos removal in Manchester.
Greater Manchester Magistrates’ Court, sitting at Manchester and Salford Court House, heard how, on 19th November 2015, Mr Barrie Lyons, a well-trained asbestos analyst with 29 years of experience, was contracted to carry out the final inspection and air testing, following asbestos removal at a construction site in central Manchester.

Mr Lyons’ task included a thorough examination of the area where asbestos had been removed from, within the defined enclosure itself and the areas surrounding it. He also had a series of air samples to collect and evaluate, to ensure that the air was substantially free of asbestos.
The investigation by the Health and Safety Executive (HSE) revealed that Mr Lyons had failed to carry out a suitable inspection of the site and had not carried out the correct amount of air sampling, despite his report to his employer and the client indicating that he had. In effect, Mr Lyons had deliberately falsified his report and so his published results could no longer be relied upon. The asbestos removal contractor had no option but to have a second clearance test carried out which incurred significant delays and additional expense.

HSE inspector Matthew Greenly said after the hearing:
“Asbestos analysts play a vital role in ensuring that areas are safe to enter after asbestos is removed. Mr Lyons sadly chose on this occasion to falsify his records which was a massive abuse of the trust placed in him by the client.

This deliberate act increased the risk of numerous people potentially being exposed to asbestos, a risk Mr Lyons would be very well aware of from his experience, all to save a little time and finish the job early.
It is hoped that the industry uses this case as a reminder that anyone involved in asbestos removal must do everything reasonable to protect people from a material which causes around 4000 deaths per year in the UK.”

Mr Barrie Lyons, of Bishops Stortford, Hertfordshire, pleaded guilty to breaching Section 7(a) of the Health and Safety at Work etc. Act 1974 and was fined £2000 and ordered to pay costs of £3905.73
Source: www.hse.gov.uk

 

 

Monday 16 January 2017


HSE prosecution round up:
Rochdale roofing contractor fined over fall from height risk

A roofing contractor has been fined after putting the lives of two employees at risk whilst working at height without protection against falls.
The employees of MW Roofing (NW) Ltd were removing a chimney on a two storey house, at the site on Bertha Road, Rochdale, when they were seen accessing the roof via a cat ladder. Waste material was being removed by buckets carried down the ladder. The company had not put in place any safety measures to prevent people falling off the roof.

Manchester City Magistrates heard that despite having previously received warnings from the Health and Safety Executive about their unsafe working at height practice the company still continued to work in a dangerous manner.
MW Roofing (NW) Ltd of Bury Road, Bamford, Rochdale pleaded guilty to two breaches, Regulation 4(1) of the Work at Height Regulations 2005 and Section 2(1) of the Health and Safety at Work etc. Act 1974 and was fined £6,000 and ordered to pay costs of £2,440.60.

Speaking after the hearing HSE Inspector David Argument said:
“You cannot ignore the dangers of working at height, it remains the main cause of death and serious injury in the workplace, particularly in the construction industry. Simple measures, such as providing guard rails can prevent death and serious injury”.

Waste company fined after worker run over
A Welsh landfill company have been fined after a worker had to have both legs amputated after being run over.

Mold Crown Court heard how the worker was walking across the yard at the Bryn Posteg Landfill site in Llanidloes, when they were hit by a large shovel loader on 6 November 2015. The worker suffered severe injuries and needed both legs amputated at the mid-thigh and was hospitalised for six-months.
An investigation by the Health and Safety Executive (HSE) found the company did not have and controls in place to protect workers from the high volume of vehicles and traffic on site. Although they had previously identified the risk and how they could prevent workers being hit by vehicles they did not put the measures in places.
Sundorne Products (Llanidloes) Limited, part of the Potter Group, in Henfaes lane, Welshpool, Powys pleaded guilty to breaching Section 2 and Section 3 of the Health and Safety at Work (1974) Act and were fined £180,000 and ordered to pay costs of £7,657.10.

HSE inspector Mhairi Duffy said:
“It is extremely important to identify how to protect your workers but you must back this up with action. This worker’s and his families lives have been changed forever because Sundorne Products Ltd failed to take action and protect their workers from being run over by vehicles on the site.
All businesses that have high volumes of vehicles on their site can learn from this case.”


HSE Health and Safety Myths Buster
Banned from using antibacterial wipes

Issue
An employee was advised that using antibacterial wipes to clean inside vehicles could lead to the development of a ‘superbug’.

Panel opinion
Superbugs are a real cause for concern for everyone, but the use of chemical disinfectants in antibacterial wipes is not going to make the situation worse when used correctly. The advice on the use of antibacterial wipes is to use one wipe per surface and then discard to avoid potentially spreading any bacteria to other surfaces. They are effective for the purpose being proposed, and seem like a sensible choice.

Wednesday 11 January 2017


Health and Safety in the news this week
IOSH: PM’s mental health pledge “a step in right direction”

Prime Minister Theresa May’s pledge to improve mental health services in UK workplaces is “a step in the right direction”, according to the Institution of Occupational Safety and Health (IOSH).
Mrs May has announced plans to overhaul mental health care in the UK, saying "there's not enough help to hand" for anyone experiencing problems.
Included in a raft of measures she introduced during a speech on Monday 9 January are a review into improving support in workplaces - headed up by mental health campaigner Lord Stevenson and Paul Farmer, Chief Executive of the charity Mind - and providing employers with additional training to support staff who need to take time off.
IOSH recognises that businesses need to ensure that they are taking positive steps to manage mental health in the workplace. Following Mrs May's speech, Shelley Frost, Executive Director of Policy at IOSH, said:

"We believe this announcement by the Prime Minister on increased employer support for mental health is a step in the right direction. We're delighted that messages from our Westminster awareness-raising event, 'Promoting mental health at work', have registered with Government. We need better-designed and managed work through improved education, training and awareness and employers have an important role to play. IOSH is currently funding research in this area and will be pleased to share the findings with the Government, to help inform their policy."

The IOSH-funded research into this area will include looking at the effectiveness of mental health training and the processes and barriers associated with returning to work after mental illness.
The plans to improve mental health services in workplaces have also been welcomed by the Institute of Directors, with the organisation's Director General Simon Walker saying employers have "a real role to play".

HSE prosecution round up:
Construction Company fined after contractor receives life changing injuries

A Lincolnshire based construction company, specialising in fitting mezzanine floors was prosecuted after a contractor fell onto a concrete floor.
Guildford Crown Court heard that M & L Installers Ltd were contracted to install a mezzanine floor at a factory in Sunbury on Thames, Surrey. The design included a hole in the mezzanine floor where a lift was due to be installed.

A contractor who was working on the floor fell just over 3.5 metres, and suffered life threatening injuries, when he stepped backwards through the hole on 13 January 2015. He was hospitalised for 2 months after receiving a severe brain injury and has not been able to work since.
An investigation by the Health and Safety Executive found that the company failed to guard the hole for the lift or board it up preventing anyone from falling through.

M & L Installers Ltd pleaded guilty to a breach of the Work at Height Regulations, Regulation 6(3) and were fined £20,000 and ordered to pay £9165.56 costs.

HSE Inspector, Amanda Huff, commented after the hearing:
“The contractor’s injuries were life changing and he could have easily been killed. This serious incident and devastation could have been avoided if basic safeguards had been put in place”.

Company prosecuted after workers were severely burned
A North East engineering company was sentenced today for safety breaches after two of its workers were burned when they were sprayed with chemicals during chemical cleaning of a pipework system.

Newcastle Crown Court heard that, on 31 July 2014, two employees of PSL Worldwide Projects Ltd received serious burns while working at a Hyclone UK Ltd site in Cramlington. The workers were using Sodium Hydroxide granules to clean a pipe system. A reaction occurred between the chemicals and water in the system that caused the liquid to heat up, building up pressure in the hose. The hose detached and sprayed the two workers with the solution, causing severe burns.
One operative received life threatening burns to his back, buttocks, arms, leg, neck and one side of his face. The other operative received burns to the right side of his head, his neck, and back, left arm and behind his right ear.

An investigation by the Health and Safety Executive (HSE) identified that the task was not adequately risk assessed by PSL Worldwide Projects Ltd, the equipment provided to do the job, in particular the hosing, was not suitable for the solution, and the company failed to provide adequate personal protective equipment (PPE) to its employees.
PSL Worldwide Projects Ltd of Bridgewater Lane, Washington, Tyne and Wear, pleaded not guilty to breaching Section 2(1) of the Health and Safety at Work Act 1974 on 28 November 2016 at Bedlington Magistrates Court but they were found guilty and the case was referred to Newcastle Crown Court for sentencing. They were fined £150,000 by Newcastle Crown Court. No costs were awarded due to the company being in liquidation.

After the hearing, HSE inspector Laura Catterall commented:
“If a suitable risk assessment had been undertaken it would have identified that the equipment being used was not right for the chemicals or the work being carried out. All companies who work with high hazard chemicals should learn from this case and ensure that their workers are properly protected.”

Crisp company fined for safety failings
A Northamptonshire company who manufacture crisps and snacks has been fined after an agency worker lost the tops of three fingers.

Northampton Crown Court heard how an agency worker, working at Tayto Group Limited was clearing a blockage of material from a machine on the production line.  The worker’s hand came into contact with shears and three fingers on his right hand were severed below the first knuckle.
An investigation by the Health and Safety Executive (HSE) into the incident, which occurred in August 2015, found that the guard on the machine was not secured at the time of the incident. The company had not implemented a formal monitoring system on this machine to ensure that all guards were in place and secure before the machine was started.

Tayto Group Limited, of Princewood Road, Earlstrees Industrial Estate, Corby, Northamptonshire, pleaded guilty to breaching Regulation 5 of the Provision and Use of Work Equipment Regulations 1998 (PUWER), and was fined £330,000 and ordered to pay costs of £11,752.23.
After the hearing, HSE Inspector Michelle Morrison said:

“This man suffered a life-changing injury in what was an entirely preventable incident. Employers must have adequate and robust systems to ensure that guards used to prevent access to dangerous parts of machinery are in place and secure before machinery is put into use.”
Source: www.hse.gov.uk

HSE Health and Safety Myths Buster
Children banned from waiting in car at Recycling centre

Issue
A recycling centre manager requested that children be removed from their parent’s car and taken outside the centre to wait as they are not allowed on site for health and safety reasons.

Panel opinion
There is specific industry guidance which clearly states that “children should stay in the car” at civic amenity sites, so this is a badly misinformed myth.  It is also a dangerous myth, in that the “health and safety” excuse used could have led to a greater risk to the children. Managers at waste and recycling sites should know their industry standards much better than this.

Company told by insurers to employ a professional ‘Keyholding Service’ to comply with health and safety regulations
Issue

A Company with an employee nominated as a primary intruder alarm keyholder was told by insurers that there is a legal requirement to establish a "Keyholding Service" with a professional security company in order to comply with health and safety regulations.
Panel opinion

Employers do need to take steps to ensure that those responding to alarm call outs are not exposed to a risk of violence. Those steps will be based on an assessment of the risks to their employees. Whilst a ‘keyholding’ service’ may form part of a safe system of work, there is no legal requirement to engage such a service. The insurance company should not have implied that this was the case.

 

Tuesday 3 January 2017


HSE prosecution round up:
Engineering firm fined over safety breach

An engineering firm was sentenced for safety breaches after a worker suffered life affecting injuries.
Leeds Magistrates’ Court heard how 39 year old father of two James Smith suffered a shattered knee cap in October 2015 when his leg was struck by a rotating chuck of a CNC lathe machine at Sigma Technologies Ltd’s Bradford plant.

The investigation by the Health and Safety Executive found that the foot pedal that operated the jaws of the chuck was faulty and the machine’s safety mechanism had been overridden. The company had allowed the machines to be operated with the guards open for setting and polishing for some time.
Sigma Technologies Ltd of Dockfield Road, Shipley, pleaded guilty to breaching Section 2(1) of the Health and Safety at Work Act 1974 and was fined £31,500 with £2,222.10 costs by Leeds Magistrates’ Court.

After the hearing, HSE inspector Andrea Jones commented:
“The risks associated with CNC machines include entanglement with rotating parts or ejection of components resulting in serious injuries. The safe guarding principles of CNC machines are well established.

It is essential that CNC machines are only operated for setting purposes with the guards open on a limited speed and limited functionality programme. Overriding the safety mechanisms should never be allowed by management or supervisors.”
Construction Company fined after worker injured

A construction company from Crawley, West Sussex has been sentenced after a worker fell from scaffolding and was injured.
Paisley Sheriff’s Court heard how Alan Wilson, a sole trader contracted to supply labour to carry out all joinery work, fell from scaffolding between timber panels at a construction site at Ivy Gardens, Millerston, Paisley on 3 February 2012. At the time of the incident Mr Wilson, who had worked for the Company periodically for over an eight year period, was erecting a timber frame to construct a block of two storey properties.

The investigation by the Health and Safety Executive (HSE) found that the Company had failed to make and put in place suitable arrangements for the effective planning, organisation, control, monitoring and review of the work at height being carried out on the timber frame of a new build property by a contractor engaged by them.
They had also failed to sufficiently assess the risk to the safety of the workers on their sites.

O’Brien Properties Ltd, Brighton Road, Crawley, West Sussex, pleaded guilty to breaching Section 3(1) of the Health and Safety at Work etc. Act (1974) and were fined £7,500.
Staffordshire Logistics Company fined over safety failings

A Logistics company based in Staffordshire has been fined after two employees were injured in two days.
Oxford Crown Court heard how a 39 year old male employee sustained crush injuries to his left foot when he was hit by a forklift truck (FLT) at the Oxford Mini plant on 6 October 2014. The court also heard that the following day a 55 year old Operations Manager sustained severe injuries including internal bleeding, a fractured pelvis and punctured lungs after a large metal box became unstable and fell from the forks of a truck striking and pinning him underneath. He was walking along a marked pedestrian walkway at the time of the incident.

A Health and Safety Executive (HSE) investigation found that FLT operators and their supervisors were not properly trained and the risk assessments in place were poor. The investigation also found that there was inadequate segregation of pedestrians and vehicles.
After the hearing, HSE inspector Kelly Nichols said: “It is vital that drivers are competent and have received appropriate information, instruction and training. Sites should be well-designed and maintained with suitable segregation of vehicles and people in order to minimise the risk of workplace transport accidents.

“The risks from workplace transport in warehouses and the required control measures to manage those risks are well known and publicised in HSE publications. It is really disappointing to find Rudolph & Hellmann Automotive Limited (RHA) failing to manage and control the risks associated with the lifting and movement of vehicles and goods in a busy workplace.
“Sadly, in this case, the prosecution shows that RHA’s management of FLT driving operations and risk control measures failed which exposed employees to danger from falling loads and from being struck by a vehicle. These serious injuries were preventable.”

Rudolph & Hellmann Automotive Limited, of Sandford Street, Lichfield, Staffordshire, pleaded guilty to breaching Section 2(1) of the Health and Safety at Work etc. Act 1974, and was fined £265,000 and ordered to pay full costs of £14,943.30.
Fatal accident to company Managing Director

A textile manufacturing company and one of its directors, Wazir Hussain were sentenced after a fatal accident to the company’s Managing Director, 36 year old Nasir Hussain.
On the 1 February 2012 the carding machine forming part of a production line at Felt Supplies Ltd Dewsbury, had become blocked with waste. Nasir Hussain, brother of Wazir Hussain, gained access to the line whilst it was still running.

Leeds Crown Court heard how Nassir overrode the safety system using a spare key to unlock one of the gates. He then stood on top of the carding machine with a metal bar in order to clear the blockage while the line was still running. Although the machine was switched off after a time it was still running down when his clothing became entangled and he was pulled into the machine and killed.
The investigation by the Health and Safety Executive found the use of a spare key to access machinery, whilst it was operational, was commonplace by the workforce. It was custom and practice for workers to gain access to the machinery in order to clear a jam or blockage.

Despite HSE issuing a Prohibition Notice to stop these unsafe practices and taking the spare keys into possession the unsafe practices were allowed to continue for a sustained period following the fatal accident with the knowledge and consent of company director Wazir Hussain.
Felt Supplies Ltd of Wharfedale Business Park, Edward Street, Bradford, pleaded guilty to breaching Sections 2(1) and 22(2) of the Health and Safety at Work Act etc 1974 and was fined £175,000 with £64,165.55 costs by Leeds Crown Court.

Wazir Hussain of Garden Street, Dewsbury, pleaded guilty to breaching Sections 2(1) and 22(2) of the Health and Safety at Work Act 1974 and was handed a 12-month prison sentence, suspended for 18 months.
After the hearing, HSE inspector Jacqueline Ferguson commented:

“This is a tragic incident that could so easily have been avoided. In this case it was the Director that was fatally injured and it could so easily have been an employee, in which case, we may have been looking at a corporate manslaughter charge.  Companies should be aware that HSE will not hesitate to take appropriate enforcement action against those that fall below the required standards especially where there has been a deliberate breach or a flagrant disregard for the law.”
Air conditioning Maintenance Company in court over worker’s fall

A Leeds based air conditioning Maintenance Company has been fined after a worker fell 3 metres through a false ceiling.
The 26 year old worker from Warrington suffered serious injuries in the incident which occurred at Iceland Foods Ltd in Clayton, Manchester, on the 17 June 2015.

The incident was investigated by the Health and Safety Executive (HSE) which prosecuted ICH Ltd for serious safety failings.
Manchester Magistrates Court heard that two engineers had been replacing a motor in an air handling unit. One worker was stood on a working platform, accessed via the cold room roof surrounded by a wooden barrier, on which the other engineer was stood.

Whilst stood on the platform fitting the new motor, the engineer stepped backwards off the platform, which was positioned over a false ceiling, falling three metres to the ground below.

ICH Ltd of Union Bridge Works, Roker Lane, Leeds pleaded guilty to a breach of Regulation 4(1) of the Work at Height Regulation 2005 and was fined £20,000.00 and ordered to pay costs of £1,050.18.
Speaking after the hearing HSE Inspector Jennifer French said:

“Falls from height continue to account for a significant proportion of all workplace deaths and serious injuries. Businesses should ensure that all work at height, including work on false ceilings, is properly planned, properly supervised and carried out safely.”
Trio of firms fined £2million after worker’s leg is broken in trench collapse

Three companies have been sentenced in Lincoln Crown Court after a worker’s leg was broken in six places when a trench which he was working in collapsed on him.
Vincent Talbot, 47, from Lincoln, suffered serious leg injuries when his leg was crushed in the incident at Fleet Street, Holbeach, Lincolnshire on 9 March 2012.

He was trapped in the trench for 15 minutes before being extracted by the fire and rescue service and then airlifted to hospital.
His right ankle has been left permanently damaged, pointing 10 degrees off line. He was off work for more than a year and vows never to work in a trench again.

An investigation by the Health and Safety Executive (HSE) found insufficient measures were taken to protect those working in trenches, and a series of safety errors had led to the collapse.
Principal contractor, Kier MG Ltd, was appointed by Lincolnshire County Council to install new storm drains.

Kier MG Ltd sub-contracted the installation work to John Henry & Sons (Civil Engineers) Ltd, who subsequently further sub-contracted the work to Lawless Civils Ltd.  Mr Talbot was a self-employed contractor hired by Lawless Civils Ltd.  John Henry & Sons (Civil Engineers) Ltd, failed to inform Kier MG of the appointment of Lawless Civils Ltd.   Lawless were approved contractors of Kier MG but not approved for this type of specialist excavation work.  Lawless appointed a supervisor who had never supervised work, and he did not have the relevant training and qualifications to do so.
After the accident to Vince Talbot, John Henry & Sons (Civil Engineers) Ltd, backdated the method statement to give the impression that it was signed by the workers prior to the trench collapsing.

A three-metre long trench box shielded workers but the pipes being laid in the trench were six metres long, meaning workers weren’t protected over the length of the pipe.
Other trench support systems such as trench sheeting were not used, and the unsupported trench had water leaking into it.

The trench had been left open overnight and concrete was being used to bed the pipes in at the bottom of the trench, instead of pea gravel as specified by the client.
Water mixed with the concrete, making the pipe levelling process extremely difficult as the level of the pipe bed had to be continuously adjusted.

When Vince Talbot was attempting to level a pipe section for a second time, the sides of the trench collapsed and trapped him.
Kier MG Ltd (formerly known as May Gurney Ltd) of Tempsford Hall, Sandy, Bedfordshire, pleaded guilty to breaching Regulation 22(1)(a) of the Construction (Design and Management) Regulations 2007. They were fined £1.5million and ordered to pay £23,327.83.

John Henry & Sons (Civil Engineers) Ltd of Barnwell Road, Cambridge denied the charge but was found guilty, after a trial of breaching section 3(1) of the Health and Safety at Work etc Act 1974. They were fined £550,000 and ordered to pay £166,217.86.
Lawless Civils Ltd of Doddington Road, Lincoln, pleaded guilty to breaching section 3(1) of the Health and Safety at Work etc Act 1974. They were fined £40,500 and ordered to pay £53,346.59.

HSE inspector Martin Waring said:
“This incident was foreseeable and avoidable and Mr Talbot’s injuries were the result of multiple failings by the duty holders, from the planning stage through to the execution of the project, resulting in the inevitable collapse of an unsupported trench. Sufficient trench support systems were not provided.

Even while the excavation phase had begun, a catalogue of errors and omissions led to the injuries of Vincent Talbot. It is inevitable that at some time an unsupported trench will collapse, for this reason safe systems of work, should be in place in order to protect persons who work in trenches. We could easily have been dealing with a fatal incident.”
Crushing plant operative left seriously injured

A crushing plant firm has been fined after worker lost his left arm when it was dragged into exposed machinery.
Rotherham Magistrates Court heard how the worker was cleaning down a large piece of machinery at a titanium alloy processing plant in Rotherham when his left arm was dragged into part of part of the unguarded mechanism, the belt and flywheel. One of his colleagues heard him screaming and found him unconscious, initially believing he was dead.

An investigation by the Health and Safety Executive found that workers on the crushing plant were required to clean down the machinery after each batch to ensure the titanium product was not contaminated; this placed them immediately next to unguarded belt and flywheels. Although the company had enclosed all the machinery with a fence including an interlocked gate, which ensured that the machinery was not powered when the gate was open, the belt and the flywheel could still move with considerable power if it was caught or nudged.
The worker was 56 years old at the time of the incident on 2 September 2014. He suffered crush injuries to his left upper limb so severe it had to be amputated above the elbow. He had previously worked for the company for 24 years but has not been able to return to work following the incident.

AMG Superalloys UK Ltd of Fullerton Road, Rotherham, pleaded guilty to breaching Section 2 (1) of the Health and Safety at Work Act 1974 and was fined £240,000 with £227,941.55 costs.
HSE inspector Carol Downes said:

“This entirely preventable incident resulted in serious life changing injuries to a worker. The risks of unguarded machinery are well-known within the industry.  If AMG Superalloys had carried out their legal duty and assessed the risk of this piece of equipment and how the workers cleaned the machine they would have realised the dangers they were exposed to.  Fitting simple guards would have prevented this worker’s arm from been dragged in, resulting in his life-changing injuries and the continuous pain he is still suffering.”
Asbestos removal supervisor fined for exposing workers to deadly fibres

An asbestos removal supervisor has been sentenced after admitting exposing numerous workers to deadly asbestos fibres during licensed asbestos removal works.
Manchester Magistrates Court heard that a concern was received by the Health and Safety Executive (HSE) claiming that Alan Burdett was allowing people into the sealed asbestos enclosure, which is designed to keep dangerous fibres from escaping and contaminating people or other areas, without any form or protective clothing or face mask.

Alan Burdett was a supervisor for Asbestos Decontamination Services Limited of Erdington, Birmingham, and was engaged in large scale asbestos ceiling removal at the vacant Raleigh House, Discovery Park, Stockport, where he was in control of a group of removal operatives on a day-to-day basis.
HSE’s investigation found that significant amount of metal framework which had supported the asbestos ceiling boards was stacked in the open building without being wrapped or sealed to prevent the spread of asbestos fibres. Alan Burdett had been filmed allowing workers to enter the asbestos enclosure without any face masks or protective clothing to prevent them being exposed to asbestos, as well as potentially releasing the deadly fibres into the main building where there were no controls to prevent exposure.

Alan Burdett of Mason Road, Erdington, pleaded guilty at Manchester Magistrates Court to breaching Section 7 of the Health and Safety at Work etc Act 1974 and was sentenced to 6 months imprisonment which was suspended for 18 months, fined £1,500.00 and was ordered to pay costs of £3,518.13.
HSE inspector Matt Greenly said after the case:

“Alan Burdett totally failed in his duty to protect himself and his workers from a foreseeable risk of serious harm from asbestos fibres.
Although he was qualified and experienced he chose to completely ignore the risks from asbestos and in doing so has exposed several people to a risk of developing a deadly disease at some point in the future. As an asbestos supervisor he was in a trusted position and he has abused this trust.”

Employee prosecuted for dangerous work at height
An employee of a steel erection firm has been sentenced at Manchester Magistrates Court after admitted working unsafely at height on a hotel development in central Manchester.

Manchester Magistrates Court heard that on the 21 January 2015 a member of public contacted HSE claiming that a man had been seen balancing on scaffold tubes in the rain while working on the roof of the multi-storey hotel. HSE Inspectors found David Mulholland working on the roof.
An investigation by the Health and Safety Executive found it was David Mulholland in the photograph provided to HSE. He had climbed up the scaffold to hammer the steel beams into place and had not used the tower scaffold that had been made available for him. There was also a full time scaffolder on site available for any of the contractors to utilise to ensure safe working platforms were in place.

David Mulholland, Victoria Road, Walton le Dale, Preston, pleaded guilty to breaching Section 7 of the Health and Safety at Work etc Act 1974 and was sentenced to 6 months imprisonment, suspended for 18 months, fined £1,400.00 and was ordered to pay costs of £2,939.18.
HSE inspector Matt Greenly said after the case:

“This case dealt with a serious work at height risk which could have led to a fatal incident. David Mulholland failed in his duty to protect his own safety while at work and also placed others at risk had he dropped any tool from the position he was seen in some 27 metres above street level. During HSE’s investigation he said that he did not appreciate how high he was.
Never before in my career as an HSE Inspector have I seen such a staggering disregard for personal safety. It is a matter of pure luck that no-one was injured or killed.

My thanks go to the member of the public who reported their concern to us as they have been instrumental in saving the life of Mr Mulholland and arguably anyone below him at that time.”
 
National airline prosecuted for not protecting workers
British Airways PLC has been prosecuted for not protecting their workers from hand/arm vibrations.

Paisley Sheriff’s Court heard how employees working within the composite workshop at the Glasgow base, who in the course of their work used hand held power tools to carry out repairs on various components, were exposed to the risk of Hand/Arm Vibration (HAV), a condition that can cause symptoms such as tingling, pins and needles, numbness and pain in the affected person’s hands.

The condition can affect sleep when it occurs at night and cause difficulties in gripping and holding things, particularly small items such as screws, doing up buttons, writing and driving.
An investigation by the Health and Safety Executive (HSE) highlighted the company’s failure to make a suitable and sufficient risk assessment to control the effect of exposure by workers to the vibrations from hand held tools. Potentially this exposed the work force to the risk of injury whilst working within the workshops.
British Airways PLC, Waterside, Harmondsworth, pleaded guilty to breaching Regulation 5 (1) of the Control of Vibration at Work Regulations (2005) and was fined £6,500.

Essex companies fined after workers exposed to asbestos
Two Essex-based companies have been fined after exposing workers to potentially deadly asbestos over a period of years, despite being alerted to the risks at their premises.

Basildon Crown Court heard that asbestos was found in poor condition when Connect Packaging Ltd moved into industrial units in Manor Road Trading Estate, Benfleet in 2007, but that it failed to act to control risk.  As a result, its employees were exposed to risk from airborne asbestos fibres.
When Connect Packaging Ltd moved out of the units in January 2009, it sublet them to Creo Retail Marketing Ltd, another company within its group, but continued to exercise some control over maintenance and repair work at the premises.

In 2014, Creo Retail Marketing Ltd undertook its own asbestos survey following the appointment of a new health and safety officer. This confirmed continuing risk of exposure to airborne asbestos fibres from sources including poorly-enscapsulated blue asbestos (crocidolite).
Despite this, workers remained exposed to these risks while the companies debated their responsibility for its removal and failed to act effectively to prevent exposure.

Health and Safety Executive (HSE) launched an investigation and its scientists found asbestos fibres at locations including the workers’ clocking-in point, on rafters above work areas, and within a stationery cupboard.
When asbestos fibres become airborne, they can be inhaled, and these tiny fibres are known to cause respiratory diseases and cancers which can be fatal. The court heard that workers at both companies were exposed to risk over an extended period of time.

Connect Packaging Ltd, registered at 91 Soho Hill, Birmingham was fined £65,000 and ordered to pay £8,150.23 in costs after pleading guilty to a breach of Section 4 of the Health and Safety at Work etc Act 1974.
Creo Retail Marketing Ltd, registered at 350 Euston Road, London, was fined £150,000 and ordered to pay £8,149.63 in costs after pleading guilty to breaches of Sections 2 and 3 of the Health and Safety at Work etc Act 1974.

After the hearing, HSE Inspector Nikki Hughes said:
“Connect Packaging Ltd is now under new ownership but while it held the tenants- repairing-lease on the rented units it had a legal duty to manage asbestos within these non-domestic premises, as did its sub-tenant, Creo Retail Marketing Ltd.

After this asbestos was identified, both companies should have acted promptly and effectively to control the potentially lethal risk to which their workers were exposed. Asbestos-related disease has a long latency period, so we cannot predict the consequences this failure to manage asbestos may have on their workers’ health.
This prosecution should act as a reminder to all persons in control of the repair and maintenance of non-domestic premises of the need to ensure that the correct control measures are put in place to prevent exposure to asbestos, so far as is reasonably practicable.”

Dairy Manufacturer fined after worker’s fragile roof fall
A dairy manufacturer has been fined £400,000 after a worker suffered serious injuries when he fell 15 feet through a fragile roof panel.

Muller UK and Ireland Group LLP, was sentenced at Manchester Crown Court, after an investigation by the Health and safety Executive (HSE).
The Court heard that on the 8th July 2015, a worker was carrying out a routine job with two colleagues to change the refrigeration gas of the chilled storage units at the firm’s premises on Lake Road, Trafford Park. They were working in the roof void of the chilled store building above the chilled units.  One of the workers stood on a fragile fire board panel at the edge of the roof space and fell down the void between the chilled unit and the building shell. He suffered injuries to his head and body.

HSE’s investigation found that the workers had not been given any information from the company about the fragile roof panels in the void, despite having worked there on a number of previous occasions.
The company had failed to carry out an adequate risk assessment prior to permitting access to the area and failed to share information about the presence of the fragile panels prior to the work being undertaken. The fragile panels were not clearly visible, had no warning markings and there were no barriers to prevent access to fragile areas.

HSE inspector Jane Carroll said after the hearing:
“This case highlights how important it is that a suitable and sufficient risk assessment is undertaken for all work at height and work within roof voids, to identify the potential for fragile panels to be present. Falls from height through fragile roofs remain a common cause of life changing or fatal injuries for individuals at work”.

Muller UK and Ireland Group LLP, of Tern Valley Business Park, Shrewsbury Road, Market Drayton, pleaded guilty to breaching Section 3(1) of the Health and Safety at Work, etc. Act 1974 and was fined £400,000 with £9,336.90 costs.
Housing association prosecuted for safety failings

A housing association has been prosecuted after allowing renovations to take place that put residents at risk of carbon monoxide poisoning.

Dumfries Sheriff Court heard that Dumfries & Galloway Housing Partnership Limited, Scotland’s second largest registered social landlord, had allowed chimneys to be removed from properties on two separate occasions. It was later discovered during the annual gas checks that the chimneys acted as the necessary gas flue for adjacent properties.
HSE’s investigation into both incidents revealed that, at the time the chimney removals took place, not only was there was no procedure in place for the Company’s workers to follow in respect of this type of work, neither were any risk assessments carried out in relation to the chimney removals which would have identified the risk to carbon monoxide poisoning for the residents.

Dumfries & Galloway Housing Partnership Limited pleaded guilty to breaching Section 3(1) of the Health and Safety at Work etc Act 1974 and was fined £8,000.
Around seven people die each year from carbon monoxide poisoning caused by gas appliances and flues that have not been properly installed, maintained or that are poorly ventilated.

Bolton resident dies in lift shaft fall
A property management company has been fined after a resident of Marsden House in Bolton died after falling down a lift shaft.

Bolton Crown Court heard how 29 year old Craig Jones and a friend were trapped in a lift and unable to raise the alarm. They attempted a self-rescue by forcing the doors open and sliding out onto the floor below.
Craig Jones slipped under the lift car and fell five stories down the lift shaft and died of multiple injuries. His friend escaped unhurt.

An investigation by the Health and Safety Executive (HSE) into the incident which occurred on 30 August 2014 found that Warwick Estates Property Management Limited (the management company for the building) failed to take suitable and sufficient steps to prevent Craig and his friend self-rescuing.
Warwick Estates Property Management Limited, of Edinburgh Way, Harlow, Essex, pleaded guilty to breaching Section 3(1) of the Health and Safety at Work etc Act 1974, and was fined £120,000 and ordered to pay costs of £45,000.

Speaking after the hearing HSE inspector Sarah Taylor said:
“Those who manage lifts have a responsibility to ensure they are properly maintained but if people are trapped they have a way to raise the alarm and are not in a position to try and rescue themselves.  The problems with this lift were well known and if Warwick Estates Property Management Ltd had fulfilled their health and safety responsibilities Craig Jones would probably be around to celebrate Christmas with his family.”